- Jun 11, 2014
- 21,153
- 33,996
Founding Member
Since there's a thread comparing their 2 defensive classes, I thought it would be fair to compare their first classes completely.
I would be remiss if I didn't add that Chump left Mac with FIVE commits just before the dead period. FIVE.
He then brought on 17 recruits in 1 MONTH. One recruit came on in December.
Some interesting comparisons:
Chump: ZERO DTs. 2 OL ---- Mac: 2 DTs. 6 OL
Chump had 2 players never show up: Blakely and McRoy
Mac had 2 players never show up: McGriff and Imatorbhebhe.
Also Chump had the #1 QB in the country and the #3 Dual Threat QB in the country.
HOWEVER, it's important to note the amount of Non-Ranked position players under Mac's 1st class. Many of them seem to be beating out the incumbents. Is it a better eye for talent? Coaching?
But you be the judge. How many players from that 2011 class became any good? Was it an issue with talent? Or an issue with coaching? How much more important is coaching than talent? Or vice-versa?
I've lined up the recruits so they can be seen side by side and by position.
I would be remiss if I didn't add that Chump left Mac with FIVE commits just before the dead period. FIVE.
He then brought on 17 recruits in 1 MONTH. One recruit came on in December.
Some interesting comparisons:
Chump: ZERO DTs. 2 OL ---- Mac: 2 DTs. 6 OL
Chump had 2 players never show up: Blakely and McRoy
Mac had 2 players never show up: McGriff and Imatorbhebhe.
Also Chump had the #1 QB in the country and the #3 Dual Threat QB in the country.
HOWEVER, it's important to note the amount of Non-Ranked position players under Mac's 1st class. Many of them seem to be beating out the incumbents. Is it a better eye for talent? Coaching?
But you be the judge. How many players from that 2011 class became any good? Was it an issue with talent? Or an issue with coaching? How much more important is coaching than talent? Or vice-versa?
I've lined up the recruits so they can be seen side by side and by position.