Detailed article on Mullen's offense

78

Founding Member
Dazed and Confused
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
19,749
27,640
Founding Member
Considering this mess, that's a quantum leap.
 

lagator

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Sep 9, 2014
5,184
9,059
Read it, some good stuff but tons of pump at the start. If his offense is so good why did he lose so damn often in conference, and only beat 2 SEC teams in 9 years with a winning conference record, and set all time futility records against teams ranked in the AP?

Is he able to make adjustments, or is his offense so one dimensional that there is nothing to switch up in the games that are going south?
 

MJMGator

Founding Member
Slightly amused
Lifetime Member
Jun 10, 2014
20,134
41,350
Founding Member
I’m expecting 8-5.
That sounds reasonable. In year one, I’ll be satisfied with that record, a functional offense and a team that doesn’t roll over when things aren’t going their way.

Oh, and he needs a top 5 class, too! :lol:
 

GatorJ

Founding Member
Hopeful
Moderator
Jun 11, 2014
21,080
33,811
Founding Member
9 wins. I think at some point we had something like 32 players out? At the end of the year? Due to suspension and injuries. And a ton of starters.

With the right coach and the right strength and conditioning program – I expect a marked improvement.
 

Since65

Senior Member
Oct 5, 2014
692
56
I have not read this article in depth but intend to go back later for a longer, closer look. I will admit to being puzzled by the extreme criticism of Mullen's offensive system and especially the claims that now that's he's at UF the Gators will never throw the ball again. Or some slightly less exaggerated version of that claim.

I did a little research on MSU and some other teams and understand even less why some are so opposed to his system.
For example, 2017 season State ran for (these are slightly rounded off numbers) 3000 yards, passed for 2000. Alabama ran for about 3400 yards, passed for about 2500. Clemson ran for about 2600, passed for 3000. Louisville ran for about 3000, passed for about 3700.

Quarterback carries....Fitzgerald ran 162 times. Hurts carried 137, Clemson's Kelly Bryant had 164 carries and Lamar Jackson had 208 carries. I don't hear a lot of talk about those other teams wearing out their quarterbacks or putting them in harm's way by running too much.

MSU's offense doesn't seem to be completely run heavy, at least compared to some other more successful teams and their quarterback isn't running it way more than other signal callers. So, what gives? Is it the play design that causes concern or what? I see that they run more than they throw but the splits don't appear to be 1960 Ohio State type offensive numbers.

Football analysis board members.....care to shed any light?
 

Zambo

Founding Member
Poo Flinger
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
12,920
32,558
Founding Member
2017 Cowbell U - Passing YPG - #116... worse than UF.

Let that sink in for a moment.
Yeah and their rushing offense was 15th and scoring offense was 37th. How does that compare to anything we've done around here in a decade?
 

Since65

Senior Member
Oct 5, 2014
692
56
2017 Cowbell U - Passing YPG - #116... worse than UF.

Let that sink in for a moment.

I guess I would say if you can run the ball successfully you're not going to throw it as much. UF was inept running and throwing. My impression is that MSU ran it relatively well as their base offense so they didn't throw as much. From what I saw of their games, they were not as terrible as UF even if they had fewer yards per game.
 

78

Founding Member
Dazed and Confused
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
19,749
27,640
Founding Member

Does someone need to explain to you why that progression is important?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    31,683
    Messages
    1,620,961
    Members
    1,643
    Latest member
    A2xGator