*** Official Jacksonville @ New England AFC Championship Game Thread***

stephenPE

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Jul 20, 2014
20,404
15,405
Horsesh*t You obviously don't know the rules.
fck that. I know the rules and played more football than you ever thought about playing,. We were taught to put our face in the jersey numbers to tackle
He didnt lead with his head but his shoulder. The head hit was a result of going through on the tackle. I still say he didnt target him with his head. And he scared kronk out of catching it. When they target with the helmet I dont like it but sometimes ithe helmets collide.

Like that stupid elbow rule in basketball. I have seen a few completely innocent and they get pitched out. I guess I would have been a criminal under the "new rules" they have in these sports.........
Look where his shoulder hits the guy. What is he supposed to do with his head? lean it back......football aint football anymore.
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,352
110,550
Founding Member
i just posted the rule for you dingleberry and it was exactly the opposite of your argument.

lets try it again:

  1. forcibly hitting the defenselessplayer’s head or neck area with the helmet, facemask, forearm, or shoulder, even if the initial contact is lower than the player’s neck, and regardless of whether the defensive player also uses his arms to tackle the defenselessplayer by encircling or grasping him
 

TheDouglas78

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
16,320
14,763
Founding Member
The Church hit was the correct call, it's one of those $hitty rules that put the DB at a disadvantage in a play like this. Part of the reason passing statistics are exploding because it's almost impossible to hit a quarterback or a wide receiver until they are 20 yards down the field.
 

NVGator

Founding Member
Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
14,928
20,243
Founding Member
fck that. I know the rules and played more football than you ever thought about playing,. We were taught to put our face in the jersey numbers to tackle
He didnt lead with his head but his shoulder. The head hit was a result of going through on the tackle. I still say he didnt target him with his head. And he scared kronk out of catching it. When they target with the helmet I dont like it but sometimes ithe helmets collide.

Like that stupid elbow rule in basketball. I have seen a few completely innocent and they get pitched out. I guess I would have been a criminal under the "new rules" they have in these sports.........
Look where his shoulder hits the guy. What is he supposed to do with his head? lean it back......football aint football anymore.
:facepalm: Check your sarcasm meter.
 

Captain Sasquatch

Founding Member
Mr. SQ, the Sashole
BANNED
Jun 10, 2014
16,578
20,016
Founding Member
Thanks for proving my point.

Here's your rules, that I apparently don't know...

If a player uses any part of his helmet (including the top/crown and forehead/”hairline” parts) or facemask to butt, spear, or ram an opponent violently or unnecessarily. Although such violent or unnecessary use of the helmet and facemask is impermissible against any opponent, game officials will give special attention in administering this rule to protecting those players who are in virtually defenseless postures, including but not limited to:

(1) Forcibly hitting the defenseless player’s head, neck, or face with the helmet or facemask, regardless of whether the defensive player also uses his arms to tackle the defenseless player by encircling or grasping him; or

(2) Lowering the head and violently or unnecessarily making forcible contact with the “hairline” or forehead part of the helmet against any part of the defenseless player’s body;

He didn't lead with his helmet, it was incidental. He led with his shoulder and actually turned his head in an effort to not lead with it.

Here's a screenshot the split second before hitting Gronk and the video below. Doesn't matter though, it won't change your mind. Interesting how you backed off that PI call right after as well, which was ridiculous.

8650



Didn't Marrone himself say he was fine with the call at halftime? Literally EVERYONE except Jags fans who don't know their place think the call was the right one.
 

Captain Sasquatch

Founding Member
Mr. SQ, the Sashole
BANNED
Jun 10, 2014
16,578
20,016
Founding Member
The Church hit was the correct call, it's one of those $hitty rules that put the DB at a disadvantage in a play like this. Part of the reason passing statistics are exploding because it's almost impossible to hit a quarterback or a wide receiver until they are 20 yards down the field.
There was zero reason he couldn't lower his shoulder into Gronk's ribs and still force the incompletion. Zero.
 

MertzJay26

Founding Member
Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 18, 2014
12,420
23,521
Founding Member
Didn't Marrone himself say he was fine with the call at halftime? Literally EVERYONE except Jags fans who don't know their place think the call was the right one.

I think it was the right call :dunno:

And what’s this “know your place” nonsense :lol: what a douche
 

MertzJay26

Founding Member
Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 18, 2014
12,420
23,521
Founding Member
Why’d they blow the Myles Jack play dead? That’s 6 points. I can’t stop thinking about that :weep:
 

MertzJay26

Founding Member
Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 18, 2014
12,420
23,521
Founding Member
Because, in the heat of the moment, the refs thought the ball carrier was down by contact before the ball came loose. What should worry Jags fans is the fact that with the momentum in their favor after the TO, the Jags offense completely shiit the bed and did nothing on offense.

Ruling on the field was a fumble. Let the play go and then review. No advantage or reason to blow it dead.

And yes, the coaching does worry me.
 

OllieGator

Founding Member
Member....huh, huh, huh
Lifetime Member
Jun 13, 2014
1,036
1,330
Founding Member
Ruling on the field was a fumble. Let the play go and then review. No advantage or reason to blow it dead.

And yes, the coaching does worry me.

This. They called it a fumble. If they ruled the RB down then I understand the whistle.

Hackchamp? Mushkett?

I kinda like the last one.
 

Theologator

Enchanter
Lifetime Member
Aug 11, 2015
8,282
15,890
Why’d they blow the Myles Jack play dead? That’s 6 points. I can’t stop thinking about that :weep:

Jack was clearly down by contact.

What bothered me more was the bogus holding call in the play when Bortles threw them out of bad field position. The Jags’ OL pancaked the Patriot DL. Hands were inside. He just caught him right and drove him down. Had that play stood the whole complexion of the game would have changed.
 

MertzJay26

Founding Member
Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 18, 2014
12,420
23,521
Founding Member
Jack was clearly down by contact.

What bothered me more was the bogus holding call in the play when Bortles threw them out of bad field position. The Jags’ OL pancaked the Patriot DL. Hands were inside. He just caught him right and drove him down. Had that play stood the whole complexion of the game would have changed.

Disagree. Jack didn’t get possession until after he rolled over. Oh well, time to move on....to Florida basketball woooo!!
 

Gatorraid81

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Dec 4, 2016
6,063
6,875
Everybody pointing to penalties. LOL.

That’s only what people who lose always do. Don’t be one of those people.

I didn’t see anything in the game where there was a monumental change by a non-call. Not like the swindle in the swamp.

If the defense doesn’t have the stupid illegal hit on Gronk. Or the following giant PI call then they probably win the game. Disciplined players don’t make stupid penalties.


The hit on Gronk was correctly penalized, but Church led with his shoulder and after the contact the heads clashed. Tired of hearing how the Jags head-hunted Gronk, how else is somebody in Church's position suppose to come up and hit a big Fu**er like Gronk, he was hitting him like he was going to catch the ball. The following PI penalty was a bad call, ball landed out of bounce with the receiver running out of bounds, while both the receiver and the Jag DB were pushing the whole way.
 

Gatorraid81

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Dec 4, 2016
6,063
6,875
Agreed. All 6 calls on the Jags were legit. I thought the Pats got away with a handful of calls that sure seemed like they would’ve been called on anyone else, especially the missed defensive holding as Lewis was coming across the formation on 3rd down in the fourth quarter. That said, Muschamping is what lost that game. NFL coaches are so smart but they sure do get stupid when they have a lead against a superstar QB.

All penalties on Jags were correctly called except the Bouye PI call, both players were shoving off on the play, the ball was uncatchable and the receiver was running out of bounds. Should have been a no call, even a novice football fan would've seen that. LOL
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    31,678
    Messages
    1,620,213
    Members
    1,643
    Latest member
    A2xGator