- Jan 2, 2018
- 7,032
- 10,100
Wasn’t directed at anyone - just throwing out the standard defense for why someone chose a different team and why we didn’t want him anyways.
I think he was saying that MSU doesn't typically hire great recruiters and the new MSU staff likely are not great recruiters. Thus if they recruit at the same level Mullen did there, then that's a sign Mullen wasn't/isn't a great recruiter.So Mullen isn't a good recruiter because he didn't pull in top classes there, but when the new staff fares about the same, it's because of the school....
Hmmm...
Yep. Once committed here. He’s a good talent but awful in the classroom. Possibility he still doesnt make it in anywhere relevantIs he the kid who signed w/ Nebraska and ended up in JUCO?
They are committing to a program that HASNT been a laughingstock for the last 8 years.
Heres the kickback though. Theres a good chance MSUs class is very good this year because of the depth of talent in the state. But he will not and will refuse to see that at the end. It would have been very good with Mullen there too with the chance to actually land guys like 5 star Dean.I think he was saying that MSU doesn't typically hire great recruiters and the new MSU staff likely are not great recruiters. Thus if they recruit at the same level Mullen did there, then that's a sign Mullen wasn't/isn't a great recruiter.
Of course by the time the new MSU staff has its first full recruiting cycle, Mullen will have had a full cycle here and we won't need a proxy to figure out how good he is or isn't.
These kids were ten the last time we scores more than 14 points give or take a few pointsThey are committing to a program that HASNT been a laughingstock for the last 8 years.
It's called battered wife syndromeWhen we get early commits we are told “nothing counts until the the LOI is faxed in on signing day”. When others get early commits we are told the sky is falling and we are way behind the 8 ball. Message boards.......