Should jhbyrd be banned from the Chatter?

Should jhbyrd be permanently sent back to Swamp Ass?

  • Yes

    Votes: 21 24.7%
  • No

    Votes: 64 75.3%

  • Total voters
    85
Status
Not open for further replies.

gator1946

Founding Member
Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 10, 2014
4,188
6,312
Founding Member
I don't think you should ban him. I don't read his stuff and I don't car.

So just the fact that I vote no should be reason enough for Ox to ban him.

While I'm at it, I don't think Ox should ban me either.
 

T REX

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2014
10,107
7,389
Founding Member
In that same thread they practically brag about running off Itraz while saying he called it on Mac all along and how much football intelligence he had. They also said anything negative about the coach is bad for the program and recruits read these boards. You know, the usual pumper propaganda. I would argue that backing a bad coach past his expiration date is very bad for the program.
 

jhbyrd

Banned
BANNED
Apr 17, 2018
1,061
254
At least not after Meatchicken.



Only after Meatchicken, amirite?
First suggestion of firing was game one year 3. As I have said I give them a fair chance to recruit their players and get in their system. Mac improved the UF ranking in both of his first two years and won his division both years. First new SEC coach to ever do that.
 
Last edited:

NVGator

Founding Member
Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
14,928
20,243
Founding Member
First suggestion of firing was game one year 3. As I have said I give them a fair chance to recruit their players and get in their system. Mac improved the UF ranking in both of his first two years and won his division.
Thanks for confirming.
 

NVGator

Founding Member
Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
14,928
20,243
Founding Member
When did you first say we should fire him? FYI I never said Mac was a GOD before or after Michigan.
After the complete disaster of a 2nd half performance against UT in 2016. The writing was on the wall. Strike 2 was the pathetic performance at Arkansas. I saw that coming a mile away. He should have been left on the tarmac in DFW.
 

BruceWayne

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2016
877
1,155
How about the end of the 2016 season when we didn't score a TD on offense for like 4 games to end the season? That wasn't a red flag?
 

jhbyrd

Banned
BANNED
Apr 17, 2018
1,061
254
After the complete disaster of a 2nd half performance against UT in 2016. The writing was on the wall. Strike 2 was the pathetic performance at Arkansas. I saw that coming a mile away. He should have been left on the tarmac in DFW.
When was your strike 3?
 

oxrageous

Founding Member
It's Good to be King
Administrator
Jun 5, 2014
37,017
98,031
Founding Member
Yes, an argument can be made that it was obvious by the end of the first press conference. Possibly even before that.

What a walking embarrassment that guy was. Foley really effed up in epic fashion.
 

T REX

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2014
10,107
7,389
Founding Member
Fake fg by lsu. Everyone knew it was a fake and that moron let it happen. I knew that day it was amateur hour. Stupid t shirt with back to back SEC East titles on it. Embarrassing.
 

Mr.Breeze

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2018
50
1
In that same thread they practically brag about running off Itraz while saying he called it on Mac all along and how much football intelligence he had. They also said anything negative about the coach is bad for the program and recruits read these boards. You know, the usual pumper propaganda. I would argue that backing a bad coach past his expiration date is very bad for the program.

Can’t argue with that, and Muschamp was given 1 year too many. Mac? He clearly sucked, but with those 2 damn “east titles” it would have been near impossible to run him off after 2 years, especially given the train wreck he inherited from Chump. SS ran him off at his earliest opportunity.

Now, back to your point on the “expiration date”....how in hell does that apply to Dan Mullen?
 

TheDouglas78

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
16,324
14,771
Founding Member
Can’t argue with that, and Muschamp was given 1 year too many. Mac? He clearly sucked, but with those 2 damn “east titles” it would have been near impossible to run him off after 2 years, especially given the train wreck he inherited from Chump. SS ran him off at his earliest opportunity.

Now, back to your point on the “expiration date”....how in hell does that apply to Dan Mullen?

No one is saying that Mullen is past his expiration date, and he should see year three as long as something incredibly stupid doesn't happen. But in year three we should know if we are coach shopping again in December, or if he is a guy that can get us back to elite level. The problem with Mullen is that through he is better than the last two hirers. He doesn't have a history of being an elite coach or an good recruiter. He very well might be a good coach to very good coach, but nothing that says elite. The problem with that is Spurrier changed the culture not only of the program but of the fanbase. Good is no longer good enough.
 

Mr.Breeze

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2018
50
1
No one is saying that Mullen is past his expiration date, and he should see year three as long as something incredibly stupid doesn't happen. But in year three we should know if we are coach shopping again in December, or if he is a guy that can get us back to elite level. The problem with Mullen is that through he is better than the last two hirers. He doesn't have a history of being an elite coach or an good recruiter. He very well might be a good coach to very good coach, but nothing that says elite. The problem with that is Spurrier changed the culture not only of the program but of the fanbase. Good is no longer good enough.

Can’t argue with this - in season 3 we should have a pretty clear idea if Mullen is able to put the program back where it belongs.

Of course, the differences between us all come down to the criteria we use in evaluating him in season 3. It would be easy to say he should have won the SEC Championship by then.......wait, does that mean he should have won it in his 2nd season, or by the END of season 3? You gonna give him 3 full seasons, or more like 2 1/2?

Let’s assume for now that he’s a hell of a lot better than the last two clowns. That’s a very safe assumption, no?
 

T REX

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2014
10,107
7,389
Founding Member
Can’t argue with that, and Muschamp was given 1 year too many. Mac? He clearly sucked, but with those 2 damn “east titles” it would have been near impossible to run him off after 2 years, especially given the train wreck he inherited from Chump. SS ran him off at his earliest opportunity.

Now, back to your point on the “expiration date”....how in hell does that apply to Dan Mullen?

I've been pretty easy on Dan Mullen. If you are anti-Swamp Ass then by all means welcome to the board.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.