- Aug 1, 2018
- 2,895
- 2,963
Heck yeah!!! Better to be there. Lets see how bama does rest of season. Most of us realize that most days we are not on their level yet but who knows. That's why they play the game.
Honest Question
- Thread starter Big Wave
- Start date
- Jun 11, 2014
- 6,892
- 6,165
Founding Member
- Aug 28, 2014
- 16,541
- 26,096
I think we can hang with either for 2/3 quarters but I think we will run out of gas in the end.
2/3rds quarters?
- Jun 11, 2014
- 6,892
- 6,165
Founding Member
just another opinion,
Last edited:
- Jun 11, 2014
- 6,892
- 6,165
Founding Member
2/3rds quarters?
2 or 3 quarters
- Jun 12, 2014
- 16,320
- 14,761
Founding Member
UGA is worse than last year, lost all that upperclassman talent and leadership and it has shown.
UK is better, but not light years... They will still be around a four loss team going into the bowl season (difference being wins against US and a bad MSU team)
UT is still a dumpster fire, only "quality" win is against a extremely questionable Auburn team
Mizzou is better, but not a good team
Agree on Vandy and Cawks
When we are schit we complain about the division, but the division hasn't improved that much from last year (or the previous years). The West has obviously gotten worse LSU being the second best team great talent with horrible coaching. Mullen might be the second best coach in the SEC.
- Nov 13, 2017
- 1,234
- 2,271
To the OP: if we're 11-1 that means we beat UGAly and if UK goes to the SECCG that means they beat UGAly and Mizzou. I don't see them beating both.
I want us to control what we can control, and that means 11-1. We can't beat either of those teams FOR Kentucky...they have to do it themselves.
Regarding some of the other comments, does anyone seriously think it's advantageous for us to NOT play in the SECCG? Of course it's advantageous. It means we win games and compete for the conference title. Can't win the SEC if we don't play in the championship.
Morons.
I want us to control what we can control, and that means 11-1. We can't beat either of those teams FOR Kentucky...they have to do it themselves.
Regarding some of the other comments, does anyone seriously think it's advantageous for us to NOT play in the SECCG? Of course it's advantageous. It means we win games and compete for the conference title. Can't win the SEC if we don't play in the championship.
Morons.
- Jun 14, 2014
- 5,126
- 4,524
Founding Member
This Alabama team might be the best team I have ever seen in College Football. It is early and we will see how they do as the season moves forward, but I honestly don't care if we play them or not in Atlanta. It would be interesting (assuming we beat UGA) to see how we compare against this team, but I also think it is possible we get completely blown out.
- Nov 16, 2017
- 5,547
- 13,084
1995 Nebraska would like a word with you about this. They averaged 53.16 points per game, while allowing only 14.5 points per game. With that said, let me go throw up.
- Jun 12, 2014
- 16,320
- 14,761
Founding Member
I think that Nebraska team might have been able to beat just about all National Champions since, and most of those games would be blow outs.
- Nov 16, 2017
- 5,547
- 13,084
I hate admitting it, but you're probably right.
- Aug 4, 2014
- 232
- 271
I completely agree. I think going into Doak and beating them would be a great in state recruiting statement for us.
- Jun 5, 2014
- 37,004
- 97,949
Founding Member
- Nov 16, 2017
- 5,547
- 13,084
I think we've been down so long the idea of taking a loss we could avoid appeals to some fans more than the slim potential of a historic win. I understand that mentality, Lord knows our Gators have been putrid - but I'll take a chance at history any chance our boys get it. Wasn't 96 a bit sweeter because of the disaster at the end of 95? For me it was.
- Jun 12, 2014
- 16,320
- 14,761
Founding Member
I think Alabama could blow us out, but we could also pull off the win. I think it would be a close game as long as we stay turn over free. I prefer to go to Atlanta, but would hope for a good showing, that will get recruits especially early signing period recruits energized.
- Jun 13, 2014
- 758
- 538
Founding Member
I kind of agree with you, esp since KY has NEVER made it to the SECCG. If they do, that would leave Vandy as the only East team to have never made it (and, realistically, they never will). I think every West team, including TAMU, has, at least once. Unless Ole Miss never has, but I think they did . . . once.
As for not having to play the Bama juggernaut, yes, I'd rather not be embarrassed by them. We can beat the Puppies, finish 11-1, not play for the SEC title, and still get a good "New Years' Six" bowl (Sugar? Peach?). On the flip side, it would be somewhat frustrating to have gone 11-1 and not played for the SEC title, but that's life. Finishing 11-1 will not just help recruiting, it would set us up as a true contender in 2019.
- Dec 4, 2016
- 6,063
- 6,875
Gatormb
Well-Known Member
- Jul 26, 2018
- 707
- 613
Last time I saw Dusty Rhodes live was in Jax and he had a Texas chain fence match against the Missouri Mauler.
He got tossed out of the ring with his head under the apron and I caught him cutting his forehead under the mat so when he came up he was all bloody.
- Jun 14, 2014
- 5,126
- 4,524
Founding Member
IMO... 2001 Miami is the best college football team in history, 1995 Nebraska is #2.
- Jun 12, 2014
- 16,320
- 14,761
Founding Member
That Miami teams had the best NFL talent (especially on defense), but I would say that didn't function as a complete team that Nebraska team did. The game would be close. Don't know if Miami could stop that option, consistently, or give Nebraska could stop Miami's pro running game and play action pass.
