- Jun 19, 2014
- 12,782
- 31,923
Founding Member
There was a woman named Sondra London. Crazy. Fancied herself an author or journalist. She allegedly fell in love with Rolling and wanted to marry him. Or she wanted to marry him so she could sell his "artwork" and a book about him and cash in.
This came up in law school. We were all disgusted by her. I suggested in class that they should grant her and Rolling conjugal visits. If she was going to profit off of that scum, she should have to suffer some. If she's going to profit, I said, make her really earn it. That did not go over very well in class.
Later, one of my assignments in Legal Research and Writing class was to do a memo of law on whether profiting from his crime was legal or not.
It's a tougher question than you might think. New York wrote a "Son of Sam" law prohibiting criminals from writing books or whatnot to profit from their crimes. It was overbroad and struck down as violating the First Amendment. The way it was written, not only would it prevent a murderer from selling an autobiography, but even stuff the autobiography of Malcolm X (he was arrested many times) would be barred, or a reformed burglar writing a book about how to secure your home, that sort of thing.
Florida passed a law but tried to narrowly tailor it to withstand constitutional muster. I think our Professor passed on the best memos to the State knowing this would be coming up.
It did go to court a few years later when the State put a lien on the profits from the book Rolling wrote with London and the Florida law stood (although it may have been on other grounds, I can't recall now). However, I believe the law only applied to books or art about the crime in question. If he wanted to draw pictures of rainbows and unicorns or bats and demons he could sell those to his heart's content.
Sondra freakin' London. I'm not a hateful person but I could not hate her more. I wish the absolute worst upon her.
Alex.
This came up in law school. We were all disgusted by her. I suggested in class that they should grant her and Rolling conjugal visits. If she was going to profit off of that scum, she should have to suffer some. If she's going to profit, I said, make her really earn it. That did not go over very well in class.
Later, one of my assignments in Legal Research and Writing class was to do a memo of law on whether profiting from his crime was legal or not.
It's a tougher question than you might think. New York wrote a "Son of Sam" law prohibiting criminals from writing books or whatnot to profit from their crimes. It was overbroad and struck down as violating the First Amendment. The way it was written, not only would it prevent a murderer from selling an autobiography, but even stuff the autobiography of Malcolm X (he was arrested many times) would be barred, or a reformed burglar writing a book about how to secure your home, that sort of thing.
Florida passed a law but tried to narrowly tailor it to withstand constitutional muster. I think our Professor passed on the best memos to the State knowing this would be coming up.
It did go to court a few years later when the State put a lien on the profits from the book Rolling wrote with London and the Florida law stood (although it may have been on other grounds, I can't recall now). However, I believe the law only applied to books or art about the crime in question. If he wanted to draw pictures of rainbows and unicorns or bats and demons he could sell those to his heart's content.
Sondra freakin' London. I'm not a hateful person but I could not hate her more. I wish the absolute worst upon her.
Alex.