Driskel

[ufgator812]

We haven't scored in bunches because WM doesn't roll that way.

 

[deuce]

I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.

 

[TheDouglas78]

I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.

Winning is the most important.

 

[NavetG8r]

I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.

but hanging 50 on em sure feels good

 

[deuce]

I like seeing our guys scoring big but I'll take 1 point wins over our major rivals everyday.:dance2:

 

[ufgator812]

I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.

No reason you can't strive for both

 

[ufgator812]

I like seeing our guys scoring big but I'll take 1 point wins over our major rivals everyday.:dance2:

Lucky you. You got to see 4 wins last year.

 

[deuce]

I like seeing our guys scoring big but I'll take 1 point wins over our major rivals everyday.:dance2:

Did you see us beat our major rivals last year?

 

[ufgator812]

I like seeing our guys scoring big but I'll take 1 point wins over our major rivals everyday.:dance2:

No. My comment says 4 wins. "." . And that's the point. Without the right philosophy, it's not gonna happen over our "major rivals" or vandy or gsu either.

 

[ergator920103]

Muschamp has stated he wants to get players in-game playing time to build depth. Blowing out weak opponents is how you do that... Idaho & Eastern Michigan are weak opponents. We need to blow them out not, win by one point...

 

[Bernardo de la Paz]

I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.

Having an average margin of victory of multiple touchdowns is what increases your margin for error and hence leads to more wins, because **** happens. You can look all you want, but you aren't going to find an example of a team sustaining success over several seasons while barely winning their games.

 

[t-gator]

I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.

You have to have the capability to score 50 in order to win a championship imo

 

[rogdochar]

Are other teams with poor OLs only playing their lesser QBs ?

Sono, the conversation included the worry that our best qualified would not see the field … like seniority would line them up to play. That's why I asked.

 

[deuce]

Muschamp has stated he wants to get players in-game playing time to build depth. Blowing out weak opponents is how you do that... Idaho & Eastern Michigan are weak opponents. We need to blow them out not, win by one point...

missed the part about major rivals?

 

[deuce]

No reason you can't strive for both

no reason at all....

 

[deuce]

I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.

You have to have the capability to score 50 in order to win a championship imo

I thought the prevailing wisdom is that "defense wins championships"!

 

[deuce]

I like seeing our guys scoring big but I'll take 1 point wins over our major rivals everyday.:dance2:

my point is that a win by one point counts the same as a win by 50 points.

btw: you added the word win after I posted.

 

[deuce]

I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.

Having an average margin of victory of multiple touchdowns is what increases your margin for error and hence leads to more wins, because **** happens. You can look all you want, but you aren't going to find an example of a team sustaining success over several seasons while barely winning their games.

the last few offensive juggernauts in college football have all been beat by better defenses.

 

[GIGator]

Law, I enjoy some of the things you write; however, your never-ending bashing of Driskel makes me anxious to hear you beep like a tractor, in reverse, when Roper and Driskel make you bust out the microwave Crow. You don't give the kid any chance of succeeding and that's mainly because you have dug yourself in to such a deep hole that you can't even pop your head up to see what's going on around you. I understand the lack of complete confidence in Driskel, but, I believe two things: one, you enjoy getting others fired up over Driskel and two, you enjoy getting others fired up over Driskel. No person could really believe that Driskel has no chance, at all, of turning things around. There are several NFL Scouts who believe Driskel will have a very good year and position himself to move up the Draft charts. They know a little about football and they understand that Jeff has not been properly coached, nor has he been used in a way the takes advantage of his strengths. I watched the Miami game, again, the other day and Jeff moved the offense up and down the field. It wasn't until the mistakes in the red zone, not only by Jeff, that the offense stalled. It's going to be interesting when you have to admit that you were poking people with your stick, for kicks.

 

[t-gator]

I think winning is more important than "hanging 50" on a few teams.

You have to have the capability to score 50 in order to win a championship imo

Well what part of statement contradicts that?