Florida’s offense
- Thread starter Slevin
- Start date
- Oct 6, 2016
- 2,019
- 784
- Jun 11, 2014
- 34,948
- 33,057
Founding Member
Marine1
Semper Fidelis
- Dec 20, 2015
- 2,923
- 8,113
Ahhh....refreshing.
- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,399
- 110,703
Founding Member
- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,399
- 110,703
Founding Member
You get a dislike bc you earned it and bc you posted the worst smilie in history.Truth is truth
- Aug 11, 2015
- 8,294
- 15,906
That’s true. I’m happy for the incremental difficulty of our schedule. It’s giving us time to grow into the offense.
Ut’s big issue is its OL. It’s defense isn’t horrible. We played pretty well.
- Nov 1, 2017
- 3,253
- 7,311
Without the specular play of our special teams and defense this game could have been close. The offense still has a long way to go or the inconsistency will show up in a bad way against the top tier teams on our schedule.
To his credit Franks is getting better but is not close to where he needs to be. If the Mull can continue to develop Franks we can be pretty good. To me thats the big question that remains to be seen.
Go gators Beat Miss. State!!!
To his credit Franks is getting better but is not close to where he needs to be. If the Mull can continue to develop Franks we can be pretty good. To me thats the big question that remains to be seen.
Go gators Beat Miss. State!!!
- Jun 14, 2014
- 7,388
- 9,043
Founding Member
We asked for improvement in the offense. Thus far, it's improved. I will take it for now. And no way that Macnusschump would have done what's been done thus far. We knew it wouldn't be overnight, but at least I'm enjoying watching them play as opposed to the last few seasons.
- Aug 28, 2014
- 16,541
- 26,096
- Nov 19, 2014
- 9,225
- 14,957
To be honest, with the way our last 2 games have transpired, these offensive stats are really meaningless. Granted we have scored plenty of points for the obvious reasons, but we are probably near the bottom in plays run and yardage. Of course points are more important and I have never been one to care about # of plays or plays per minute, etc. what I deem valid is based on the way a game transpires or in a game where there are not turnovers or ST big plays, what is going on and how are things being handled? The small glimpses we have had in those situations the past 2 games leaves plenty of room for improvement in both execution and play calling. I am not much on those stats, but more what I see given the particular circumstance.
Ancient Reptile
Senior Member
- Mar 4, 2015
- 10,796
- 11,119
The improvement I see is in the O-line. Saved the game and just rewatched it . O-LINE isn't great, but it's definitely improved. Even our RBs pick up blitzes better.
- Jun 9, 2014
- 19,749
- 27,640
Founding Member
Important subject to the long-term outlook, relatively skewed shortterm. We're second in scoring behind Georgia in the East and have capitalized on field position brought about by tremendous special teams play and an opportunistic defense. There is no question we have playmakers on offense that we can better utilize and likely will.
Which brings me to my point.
I'm not sure this team is ever going to put together great offensive stats under Mullen, certainly not without a playmaker quarterback. But I feel confident after four games that it can consistently put the offense in a position to capitalize and that the offense itself will continue to experience growth.
At the end of the day, points are all that matters.
Which brings me to my point.
I'm not sure this team is ever going to put together great offensive stats under Mullen, certainly not without a playmaker quarterback. But I feel confident after four games that it can consistently put the offense in a position to capitalize and that the offense itself will continue to experience growth.
At the end of the day, points are all that matters.
- Jul 29, 2014
- 22,152
- 23,373
Remember when we started 2010 4-0 and Trey Burton was going to win a Heisman after the UK game....
Remember when we started 2012 4-0 and Driskel was going to turn into a functional CFB QB....
Remember when we started 2014 4-0 and Roper was going to have Driskel in the Heisman running....
Remember 2015 when we started 4-0 and Butters had all but fixed the program until he sent the best QB in CFB down the road to win a Heisman at WVU this year....
Much like rankings I wish the NCAA wouldn't release any stats until mid October....
Remember when we started 2012 4-0 and Driskel was going to turn into a functional CFB QB....
Remember when we started 2014 4-0 and Roper was going to have Driskel in the Heisman running....
Remember 2015 when we started 4-0 and Butters had all but fixed the program until he sent the best QB in CFB down the road to win a Heisman at WVU this year....
Much like rankings I wish the NCAA wouldn't release any stats until mid October....
- Aug 28, 2014
- 16,541
- 26,096
1) No
2) Chump was a sham from the start
3) See #2
4) Had we kept Grier... Mac would've had ruined him.
Are you saying we should wait and see? Good advice Concrete Obvious.
- Jun 10, 2014
- 20,137
- 41,352
Founding Member
- Sep 24, 2015
- 4,687
- 10,416
No one on planet earth thought that Driskel was going to be in the Heisman running or be a functional qb. No one. Except you maybe.
- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,399
- 110,703
Founding Member
