Florida Gators, Jim McElwain building like Clemson, not Alabama

BMF

Bad Mother....
Lifetime Member
Sep 8, 2014
25,434
59,384
Florida Gators, Jim McElwain building like Clemson, not Alabama

https://www.seccountry.com/florida/florida-is-building-its-program-like-clemson-not-alabama


QB Malik Zaire’s transfer to the Florida Gators is the safe, but wrong choice for coach Jim McElwain. Florida needs to focus on 2018 rather than bringing in a stop-gap quarterback for 2017.

This wasn’t a popular opinion. Your responses of “always play the best player” were overwhelming, so much so that I started wondering whether I was wrong. It wouldn’t be the first time.

How quickly do head coaches win championships?
I thought back to something I wrote back in January. That piece explored recruiting, especially for programs that win national championships.

Taking that concept further, I decided to examine how long it took coaches to win their first national championship with a program. Note that NA means that the coach has a previous championship with that team.

2017-06-11-National-Championship-Coaches-1st-Title_tzcrx3.jpg

The year at the school that a coach won his first national championship. (Will Miles/SEC Country)
There is one outlier on that list: Clemson’s Dabo Swinney.

There was a lot of commotion after Clemson won the national title that they won despite sub-elite recruiting. The knock on Swinney’s recruiting was true for his early years. He took over a struggling team from Tommy Bowden in 2008 and proceeded to put together recruiting classes ranked 31, 28 and 10 according to the 247Sports composite rankings.

Jim McElwain’s situation at Florida is similar: He brought in recruiting classes ranked 21, 12 and 11 in his first three years, according to the 247Sports rankings. While these rankings are not as poor as Swinney’s initial classes, McElwain the recruiter is nowhere near the standards set by Nick Saban (13, 3 and 2) or Urban Meyer (5, 2 and 3) in their first three years at Alabama and Ohio State.

Measuring progress in a college football program
Expected wins is a way of quantifying how good a team really is by looking at points scored and allowed rather than wins and losses. This allows for a look at how a team is improving independent of factors outside of that team’s control.

And if you look at Swinney’s results from ’08-’10, it’s amazing that he continued to get a chance to build the Clemson program. Part of that is because the program was in a state of perpetual rebuilding prior to his promotion. But cooler heads saw progress evident in the chart below.

2017-06-11-Clemson-expected-wins_lwizbw.jpg

Expected wins vs. actual record for Clemson under Dabo Swinney. (Will Miles/SEC Country)
Swinney had to survive ’10. The team showed improvement in ’09, but cratered to a 6-7 record in ’10. And, had he not gotten lucky, he probably would have been dismissed after ’11.

That team had a fairly poor point differential but managed to win 10 games against a light schedule. Big losses to Virginia Tech (38-10) and West Virginia (70-33) also skewed the point differential.

But the major difference was that Swinney found a quarterback. Tajh Boyd threw 63 passes in ’10, but didn’t see significant playing time. Swinney went with Boyd out of the gate in ’11, and Boyd performed better than any Clemson QB under Swinney or his predecessor Tommy Bowden.

The success under Boyd set the stage for consistent, although not spectacular, recruiting. Clemson should have won an average of 8.1 games per season in Swinney’s first three years. That climbed to 9.2 wins per season the next three years. That helped Clemson recruit blue-chip players like Sammy Watkins, DeAndre Hopkins, and eventually, Deshaun Watson.

Now Clemson boasts back-to-back national championship game appearances. Those have not been flukes. Clemson managed 11.7 expected wins per year the last two seasons.

Swinney has built a program, and he has done it in a way different than his peers.

Application of Clemson model to Florida
Swinney is not equal to Meyer or Saban as a recruiter. He’s probably behind Florida State’s Jimbo Fisher as well. Still, he found a quarterback who would be around long enough to start to attracting elite recruits. Then, he got fortunate to bring in Deshaun Watson, a transcendent player.

If this sounds familiar to Gators fans, it should. Nobody is going to confuse Jim McElwain’s recruiting ability with Saban, Meyer or Fisher. But he is an unbelievable in-game coach, and has started to bring in high-level offensive talent despite the hole at quarterback.

And if you look at where the program has been under former coach Will Muschamp to where it is now, the similarities continue.

2017-06-11-Florida-expected-wins_zuskbv.jpg

Expected wins vs. actual record for Florida under Will Muschamp and Jim McElwain. (Will Miles/SEC Country)
Muschamp averaged 7.5 expected wins in his four years in Gainesville. Despite the offensive futility, McElwain’s teams have averaged 8.7 expected wins. The issue is that much of that success came from the defense, and that defense just lost 7 starters to the NFL. Thus, this is the year McElwain must survive, just as Swinney survived ’10.

But the more I look at it, the more I think Swinney got lucky. Boyd had little experience coming into ’11. Had he been just average (QB rating of 120) instead of excellent (QB rating of 141.2), Swinney gets canned after ’11.

Saban has been able to recruit well enough to win consistently with quarterbacks like John Parker Wilson. Teams not named Alabamadon’t enjoy that luxury. They need transcendent quarterbacks to win championships: Watson, Jameis Winston, Cam Newton or Tim Tebow.

So McElwain probably has a tough balance to strike this season. Zaire gives him a better chance to win against Michigan. But Franks has to get some meaningful reps, or else McElwain will have to rely on an unknown in ’18 much the way Swinney did with Boyd.

Or perhaps, McElwain already has realized Franks is not going to be his Deshaun Watson or even his Tajh Boyd. And if that’s the case, the addition of Zaire buys him more time to find and recruit that player.
 

T REX

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2014
10,107
7,389
Founding Member
Here's the freaking problem with this garbage. Dabo took over MID-SEASON in 08. So that 6-7 season was really his 2nd full season. He then won ten games in his third full season. The rest is history.

So, we're taking the Clemson route? WTF? Link? This is just shyt thrown against a wall. I feel embarrassed for whoever believes it.

Mac will either make it or not. These puff pieces will have zero bearing on anything.
 

ThreatMatrix

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 28, 2014
16,541
26,096
Have to agree with teams not named Alabama need transcendent QB's. And what do Tebow, Newton, Watson, Winston all have in common? Dual-threat baby!
 

ThreatMatrix

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 28, 2014
16,541
26,096
Honestly not sure what point the author is trying to make. Despite the title the text doesn't really support a conclusion. It's part two of an earlier piece that he wrote about average recruiting rankings equating to final rankings. The outliers being Auburn and Clemson who managed to make it to the NC w/o having the recruiting to back it up. He doesn't say it but I would say the difference maker was that Auburn and Clemson got "transcendent" players in Newton and Watson respectively.
If he's saying that Florida is building like Clemson i.e. sub top 10 recruiting with a transcendent QB, well that remains to be seen slash wishful thinking.

https://www.seccountry.com/florida/florida-gators-recruiting-rankings-2017
Clemson beat Alabama for the national championship. Clemson does not always sign recruiting classes ranked in the top 5. Therefore, national championship teams can be built through non-elite recruiting classes. That’s a popular sentiment among Florida Gators fans, particularly after the Clemson win.
The thinking is that Jim McElwain is a good enough coach to overcome his second-tier recruiting. This is important because the 247Sports composite ranked the Gators’ 2015 and 2016 recruiting classes at No. 21 and 12, respectively. (Florida currently ranks at No. 19.)
The problem with this thinking is twofold. First, Clemson has excelled at recruiting, especially considering the difference in home-state talent between Florida and South Carolina. The 247Sports composite ranked Clemson’s classes from 2012-16 at No. 15, 15, 17, 9 and 11.
Four teams won a national championship during those five years: Alabama (2012, 2015), Ohio State (2014) and Florida State (2013). Those three teams’ recruiting rankings from 2012-16, according to Rivals.com?
First, second and third.

2017-01-14-Recruiting-rankings-vs-AP-polls_wilwec.jpg

Recruiting rankings vs. AP poll finish from 2012-2016 (note finishing unranked resulted in a ranking of 40 for averaging purposes). (Will Miles/SEC Country)
The above chart gives the gory details. Teams in the black whose recruiting rankings have closely matched their final average in the AP poll won national championships. Teams highlighted in red have vastly underperformed their recruiting rankings and experienced a change in head coach. This is the reason that Les Miles, Gene Chizik, Lane Kiffin, Mark Richt and Will Muschamp had to look for other work.
The smart wager for 2018 is that the Fighting Irish will be saying goodbye to Brian Kelly. Even with a second-place finish in 2012, Kelly’s teams have underperformed Notre Dame’s recruiting rankings.
The chart also indicates that Florida is further from winning a national championship with every recruiting class it puts together that ranks outside the top 10. Furthermore, Florida only occupies the ninth spot in the above list because of Will Muschamp’s recruiting.
It’s no surprise that excellent recruiting leads to titles. But it’s shocking how closely the two things correlate. Since 2006, the national champions averaged a top 10 Rivals.com recruiting ranking in the four previous years. The only exception: The 2010 Auburn team with transfer QB Cam Newton.

2017-01-14-Recruiting-rankings-prior-to-a-championship_m3jadr.jpg

Recruiting rankings for the four years prior to winning the national championship. (Will Miles/SEC Country)
Clemson is on the “low end” of these rankings, but it shouldn’t surprise anyone that it played for the title the last two seasons.
Because football is such a violent sport, injuries always play a key role. This means that depth — which touted recruiting classes provide — becomes important. The college season has expanded from a maximum of an 11-game regular season with a bowl game to a maximum of a 12-game season, a conference championship game and two College Football Playoff games.
The sentiment that Florida is “only a QB away” is not accurate. The Gators’ quarterback play needs to improve. But in 2017, my worry is not that players like Vosean Joseph and Chauncey Gardner will play well. My worry is that if they suffer injuries, their backups will account for a significant drop-off in production.
Injuries even impacted mighty Alabama this season. The Tide played a walk-on at corner against Florida and then saw the offense tank against Clemson after running back Bo Scarbrough broke his leg.
Even with a decimated secondary, Alabama came within one stop of winning 5 championships in 8 years. Coming that close was a testament to Alabama’s depth.
Jim McElwain is a good in-game coach. Maybe even a great one. He’s 13-3 in the SEC. McElwain won the East Division in back-to-back seasons. But the statistics prove he must recruit better to contend for the national title.
And because Alabama doesn’t look like it is going to slow down, he needs to recruit better to compete for an SEC title as well.
 

gatorkev85

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2015
1,544
1,903
Honestly not sure what point the author is trying to make. Despite the title the text doesn't really support a conclusion. It's part two of an earlier piece that he wrote about average recruiting rankings equating to final rankings. The outliers being Auburn and Clemson who managed to make it to the NC w/o having the recruiting to back it up. He doesn't say it but I would say the difference maker was that Auburn and Clemson got "transcendent" players in Newton and Watson respectively.
If he's saying that Florida is building like Clemson i.e. sub top 10 recruiting with a transcendent QB, well that remains to be seen slash wishful thinking.

https://www.seccountry.com/florida/florida-gators-recruiting-rankings-2017
Clemson beat Alabama for the national championship. Clemson does not always sign recruiting classes ranked in the top 5. Therefore, national championship teams can be built through non-elite recruiting classes. That’s a popular sentiment among Florida Gators fans, particularly after the Clemson win.
The thinking is that Jim McElwain is a good enough coach to overcome his second-tier recruiting. This is important because the 247Sports composite ranked the Gators’ 2015 and 2016 recruiting classes at No. 21 and 12, respectively. (Florida currently ranks at No. 19.)
The problem with this thinking is twofold. First, Clemson has excelled at recruiting, especially considering the difference in home-state talent between Florida and South Carolina. The 247Sports composite ranked Clemson’s classes from 2012-16 at No. 15, 15, 17, 9 and 11.
Four teams won a national championship during those five years: Alabama (2012, 2015), Ohio State (2014) and Florida State (2013). Those three teams’ recruiting rankings from 2012-16, according to Rivals.com?
First, second and third.

2017-01-14-Recruiting-rankings-vs-AP-polls_wilwec.jpg

Recruiting rankings vs. AP poll finish from 2012-2016 (note finishing unranked resulted in a ranking of 40 for averaging purposes). (Will Miles/SEC Country)
The above chart gives the gory details. Teams in the black whose recruiting rankings have closely matched their final average in the AP poll won national championships. Teams highlighted in red have vastly underperformed their recruiting rankings and experienced a change in head coach. This is the reason that Les Miles, Gene Chizik, Lane Kiffin, Mark Richt and Will Muschamp had to look for other work.
The smart wager for 2018 is that the Fighting Irish will be saying goodbye to Brian Kelly. Even with a second-place finish in 2012, Kelly’s teams have underperformed Notre Dame’s recruiting rankings.
The chart also indicates that Florida is further from winning a national championship with every recruiting class it puts together that ranks outside the top 10. Furthermore, Florida only occupies the ninth spot in the above list because of Will Muschamp’s recruiting.
It’s no surprise that excellent recruiting leads to titles. But it’s shocking how closely the two things correlate. Since 2006, the national champions averaged a top 10 Rivals.com recruiting ranking in the four previous years. The only exception: The 2010 Auburn team with transfer QB Cam Newton.

2017-01-14-Recruiting-rankings-prior-to-a-championship_m3jadr.jpg

Recruiting rankings for the four years prior to winning the national championship. (Will Miles/SEC Country)
Clemson is on the “low end” of these rankings, but it shouldn’t surprise anyone that it played for the title the last two seasons.
Because football is such a violent sport, injuries always play a key role. This means that depth — which touted recruiting classes provide — becomes important. The college season has expanded from a maximum of an 11-game regular season with a bowl game to a maximum of a 12-game season, a conference championship game and two College Football Playoff games.
The sentiment that Florida is “only a QB away” is not accurate. The Gators’ quarterback play needs to improve. But in 2017, my worry is not that players like Vosean Joseph and Chauncey Gardner will play well. My worry is that if they suffer injuries, their backups will account for a significant drop-off in production.
Injuries even impacted mighty Alabama this season. The Tide played a walk-on at corner against Florida and then saw the offense tank against Clemson after running back Bo Scarbrough broke his leg.
Even with a decimated secondary, Alabama came within one stop of winning 5 championships in 8 years. Coming that close was a testament to Alabama’s depth.
Jim McElwain is a good in-game coach. Maybe even a great one. He’s 13-3 in the SEC. McElwain won the East Division in back-to-back seasons. But the statistics prove he must recruit better to contend for the national title.
And because Alabama doesn’t look like it is going to slow down, he needs to recruit better to compete for an SEC title as well.
Here is a major difference between how Dabo recruits and how Mac does. Dani will go out and sign 5* skill players on offense and Mac does not. There is a big difference when your class has the #1 Qb #3 We and #2 Rb then throw in 3-4 top 10 on their defense and the rest decent players. Mac on the other hand is bringing in players outside of the top 15 at their position and it's almost every player that a major difference
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,470
110,898
Founding Member
Dabo has excellent size on the line and he doesnt sign 1/3 of his class as DBs.

We are building like Kintucky or Cowbell, not Clemson.
 

Gator2222

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2016
1,181
2,133
Here's the freaking problem with this garbage. Dabo took over MID-SEASON in 08. So that 6-7 season was really his 2nd full season. He then won ten games in his third full season. The rest is history.

So, we're taking the Clemson route? WTF? Link? This is just shyt thrown against a wall. I feel embarrassed for whoever believes it.

Mac will either make it or not. These puff pieces will have zero bearing on anything.

I hear all the time that "pumpers" cherry pick. You have said many times that Mac owns his first recruiting class even though he was only on campus for two months. I agree. Now all of a sudden Dabo is not responsible for the first 7 games he coached because it wasn't a full season? Even though he was an assistant coach at Clemson for 6 years prior to being named head coach? That seems hypocritical.

However, let's stick with your narrative and pretend that Dabo was somehow not responsible for coaching Clemson in 2008.

In 2009 Clemson was 9-5 and 6-3 in the ACC. Dabo went 1-3 against ranked teams and lost to instate rival South Carolina 34-17. That same season he brought in the #31 ranked recruiting class which featured a total of 15 players. The class had five 4* players, eight 3* players and two that were not ranked at all.

In 2010 Clemson was 6-7 and 4-4 in the ACC. Dabo went 1-3 against ranked teams and lost to instate rival South Carolina 29-7. He lost to South Florida in the Meineke Car Care Bowl. That same season he brought in the #28 ranked recruiting class which featured a total of 24 players. The class had three 4* players, eighteen 3* players and three 2* players.

McElwain has clearly outperformed Dabo through each of their first 2 full seasons at the respective schools.
 

Gator2222

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2016
1,181
2,133
Here is a major difference between how Dabo recruits and how Mac does. Dani will go out and sign 5* skill players on offense and Mac does not. There is a big difference when your class has the #1 Qb #3 We and #2 Rb then throw in 3-4 top 10 on their defense and the rest decent players. Mac on the other hand is bringing in players outside of the top 15 at their position and it's almost every player that a major difference

I get your point.

However, Dabo has been at Clemson for many years and has seen a fair amount of success including an NC and a runner up in the last two years. Mac walked into a dumpster fire that no kid in his right mind wanted anything to do with. That gives Dabo a huge advantage.

Despite that advantage, since Mac arrived at Florida, Dabo has signed four 5* offensive players and Mac has signed two 5* offensive players. In the same time period, Dabo signed a total of 15 players ranked in the top 100 nationally and Mac signed 10. Dabo signed 27 players ranked in the top 15 at their position and Mac signed 21.

Dabo is obviously doing something right in recruiting and getting key players is definitely a part of that. However, the recruiting numbers between Dabo and Mac are not that far apart.
 

Gator2222

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2016
1,181
2,133
Dabo has excellent size on the line and he doesnt sign 1/3 of his class as DBs.

We are building like Kintucky or Cowbell, not Clemson.

I would be thrilled if our line performed as well as Clemson's did last season. However, size doesn't appear to be the problem.

Clemson Starting OL NC Game
Hyatt 295
Giullermo 310
Pollard 315
Hearn 325
Crowder 340

2017 Projected UF OL (2016 Listed Weight)
McCoy 305
Ivey 305
Johnson 311
Heggie 317
Taylor 340

The individual differences are small and as a total they outweigh us by a mere 7 pounds. I would be willing to bet that the Gators 2017 OL will end up being bigger than Clemson's 2016 NC OL.

By the way, I know you are being sarcastic and I agree that it seems that we have signed a disproportionate number of DB's. However, Mac has signed a total of 69 players and by my count only 13 have been DBs (19%).
 
Last edited:

gatorkev85

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2015
1,544
1,903
I get your point.

However, Dabo has been at Clemson for many years and has seen a fair amount of success including an NC and a runner up in the last two years. Mac walked into a dumpster fire that no kid in his right mind wanted anything to do with. That gives Dabo a huge advantage.

Despite that advantage, since Mac arrived at Florida, Dabo has signed four 5* offensive players and Mac has signed two 5* offensive players. In the same time period, Dabo signed a total of 15 players ranked in the top 100 nationally and Mac signed 10. Dabo signed 27 players ranked in the top 15 at their position and Mac signed 21.

Dabo is obviously doing something right in recruiting and getting key players is definitely a part of that. However, the recruiting numbers between Dabo and Mac are not that far apart.
When you look at the difference in skill players in the top 10 at their position it's not even close. I went ahead and looked it up for you and used rivals which is the best recruiting imo and most on this site. It will show the position where they ranked at said position and what their national rank was. And the list is only skill players because that's where I've said is the biggest difference. I threw in 2018 for giggles.

Clemson
2014
Qb #1, #31
Wr #9, #68
Rb #10, #109
2015
Wr #4, #17
Rb #5, #23
Te #3, #111
2016
Wr #4 #36
Rb #4 #102
2017
Qb #2, #18
Qb #10, #184
Wr #2, #14
2018
Qb #1, #1

Florida
2014
Qb #3, # 46 (no longer with team)
2015
None
2016
Qb #6, #57
2017
Te #9 #NR

Clearly there is a major major difference in recruiting when you look at it like this. So in total Clemson has brought in 11 skill players who ranked top 10 at their position and 7/11 we're rivals 100 players. On the other side Fl has brought in a total of 2/3 wrre rival 100 players and one is not with the team anymore. It's no wonder Clemson had an offense that ranked 12th last year they bring in top talent at the skill position every year. And I didn't even include Ray Ray which is their Rb who ranked top 50 overall.
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,470
110,898
Founding Member
I would be thrilled if our line performed as well as Clemson's did last season. However, size doesn't appear to be the problem.
I was talking about the D line goof. You may have not heard, but MacNusselchump forgot to sign DTs, and says i that our 240-250 pounders are DTs.

But, no, our ragtag FIU talent OL wont be anywhere as goos as Clempson's either. I see no reason to believe we're going to score on Clown Town this year either.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    31,702
    Messages
    1,622,883
    Members
    1,643
    Latest member
    A2xGator