FSU’s top recruiter exposes she's HIV positive

alcoholica

Founding Member
I'm what Willis was talking about
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
16,754
20,381
Founding Member
Yes, I certainly exaggerated the 20x figure, but the women definetly earn much more on average. I hadn't heard that about the men years ago; I've always heard for decades that in the porn business the "Richards" were a dime a dozen and the women commanded the big paychecks.
The two biggest names in porn (all-time) are probably John Holmes and Ron Jeremy. Jenna Jameson is no longer a big name anymore, although she deserves a lot of the credit/blame for mainstream acceptance. The truth is that there is a saturation of both men and women willing to do porn now. Hard to think there will be any new icon anytime soon.
 

GatorInGeorgia

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 25, 2014
6,340
7,068
The two biggest names in porn (all-time) are probably John Holmes and Ron Jeremy. Jenna Jameson is no longer a big name anymore, although she deserves a lot of the credit/blame for mainstream acceptance. The truth is that there is a saturation of both men and women willing to do porn now. Hard to think there will be any new icon anytime soon.

No doubt there is more saturation, but a lot of that is due to technology. People can sit at their home computers, go to free websites and watch real couples next door with their faces blurred out getting it on. Incomes on average for male and female performers have come down significantly but for those professionals who are still paid to perform, I think the women still pull in more than a comparable male performer. You're probably correct about the lack of any new icons anytime soon. They're all becoming a dime a dozen these days thanks to the World Wide Web.
 

alcoholica

Founding Member
I'm what Willis was talking about
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
16,754
20,381
Founding Member
No doubt there is more saturation, but a lot of that is due to technology. People can sit at their home computers, go to free websites and watch real couples next door with their faces blurred out getting it on. Incomes on average for male and female performers have come down significantly but for those professionals who are still paid to perform, I think the women still pull in more than a comparable male performer. You're probably correct about the lack of any new icons anytime soon. They're all becoming a dime a dozen these days thanks to the World Wide Web.
In that articles, the top guys get paid about the same as the top girls for regular sex scenes. But the women get premiums for the less tame scenes, and that's where the gap widens (no pun intended). At lower levels there is also a pay gap. They go onto say that gay male workers make more than gay females.
 

Alagator

Founding Member
Senior Member
Jun 12, 2014
4,039
4,315
Founding Member
You know at least half of you would hate fuuk the shyt out of her.

I would in a heartbeat. Sorry Janice , I'm a sinner. Pray for me!

yup, in a heartbeat

I wouldn't touch that skank... I'm a strange bird, I guess. After 22 years of marriage I still find my wife incredibly sexy. We still have a great time in the sack and I've never cheated on her. I damn sure wouldn't risk catching something from that skank to bring home to my wife. No damn thanks.
 

alcoholica

Founding Member
I'm what Willis was talking about
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
16,754
20,381
Founding Member
I wouldn't touch that skank... I'm a strange bird, I guess. After 22 years of marriage I still find my wife incredibly sexy. We still have a great time in the sack and I've never cheated on her. I damn sure wouldn't risk catching something from that skank to bring home to my wife. No damn thanks.
Hey man, that's cool as ****. Unfortunately, I haven't found a girl who's worth it yet. So, yeah I'd hit that.

In addition to referencing South Park, she has also taken a stand against Islam. Not positive, but I think she may even have a bounty on her head. For certain she has received numerous death threats.
 

PastyStoole

Founding Member
Man, there's no boundary line to art. ~Bird Parker
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
2,090
5,801
Founding Member
In addition to referencing South Park, she has also taken a stand against Islam. Not positive, but I think she may even have a bounty on her head. For certain she has received numerous death threats.
Wasn't her porn schtick, like, her starting out in a Hijab and then getting nailed by five jews and a pig while her husband, the Prophet Muhammad, flogs himself in the corner? Seems like she was kinda asking for a fatwa on her head.
 
Last edited:

alcoholica

Founding Member
I'm what Willis was talking about
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
16,754
20,381
Founding Member
Wasn't her porn schtick, like, her starting out in a Hijab and then getting nailed by five jews and a pig while her husband, the Prophet Muhammad, flogs himself in the corner? Seems like she was kinda asking for a fatwa on her head.
the hijab sounds right, but pretty sure the rest isn't
 

rogdochar

Founding Member
RIP
Lifetime Member
Jun 14, 2014
25,397
29,513
Founding Member
The essence of porn sprang from prostitution. So it seems logical money conscious male producers at the origin knew the money flowed towards the hot women. Even in 2017 the reasons & money flow stays stacked favoring women.

Today, sorrowfully, college girls may be doing porn under the influence of booze & pot or they're so liking frequent supply of pot that an extra profit oriented dealer can lead her into porn. Watch out Dad's = Women's Rights may attack to replace the shame of porn to "porn pride" ... eventually leading to the right to nursing grown men in public.

Most all the spirit of the decency in the past was acquired by "fellowship" in church,. Church was a great learning institution for our youth. Today's Churches need to modernize, socialize to be more entertaining & pragmatic.
Youth religious "rock" music is taking a % of listening fans just like country music once did. except when this crowd goes ballistic it's with brotherly love and joy, instead of drugs and blurring of moral signposts.?? Even as an atheist, I can see Life was sweeter, kinder, best guidance when it was Christian structured for children, teens, & parents.
 

NavetG8r

Founding Member
Stupid
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
16,720
16,674
Founding Member
The essence of porn sprang from prostitution. So it seems logical money conscious male producers at the origin knew the money flowed towards the hot women. Even in 2017 the reasons & money flow stays stacked favoring women.

Today, sorrowfully, college girls may be doing porn under the influence of booze & pot or they're so liking frequent supply of pot that an extra profit oriented dealer can lead her into porn. Watch out Dad's = Women's Rights may attack to replace the shame of porn to "porn pride" ... eventually leading to the right to nursing grown men in public.

Most all the spirit of the decency in the past was acquired by "fellowship" in church,. Church was a great learning institution for our youth. Today's Churches need to modernize, socialize to be more entertaining & pragmatic.
Youth religious "rock" music is taking a % of listening fans just like country music once did. except when this crowd goes ballistic it's with brotherly love and joy, instead of drugs and blurring of moral signposts.?? Even as an atheist, I can see Life was sweeter, kinder, best guidance when it was Christian structured for children, teens, & parents.

Rog, you have an antiquated idea of what pot does to a person. You might consider either not saying anything about the subject since you're so out of touch with modern reality, or doing some actual research of more modern information. Pot doesn't cause anybody to do anything they wouldn't ordinarily do. In fact, it causes the opposite effect. Unlike alcohol, pot doesn't lower inhibitions. It makes you paranoid and unlikely to do things you might even do while sober. Exact opposites. Now, if you mix it with alcohol or other drugs, all bets are off. That's why most modern cannabis enthusiasts recommend not mixing your pleasures. It often leads to displeasure, which is the opposite of what you're seeking if you're smoking some good weed.
 

alcoholica

Founding Member
I'm what Willis was talking about
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
16,754
20,381
Founding Member
Rog, you have an antiquated idea of what pot does to a person. You might consider either not saying anything about the subject since you're so out of touch with modern reality, or doing some actual research of more modern information. Pot doesn't cause anybody to do anything they wouldn't ordinarily do. In fact, it causes the opposite effect. Unlike alcohol, pot doesn't lower inhibitions. It makes you paranoid and unlikely to do things you might even do while sober. Exact opposites. Now, if you mix it with alcohol or other drugs, all bets are off. That's why most modern cannabis enthusiasts recommend not mixing your pleasures. It often leads to displeasure, which is the opposite of what you're seeking if you're smoking some good weed.
But pot is glorified in the porn industry. Hence, vape girls.

LINK IS NSFW

https://www.pornhub.com/video/search?search=vaping
 

PastyStoole

Founding Member
Man, there's no boundary line to art. ~Bird Parker
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
2,090
5,801
Founding Member
for the skills she possesses and with a jimmy hat, indeed... She's a pro, it would be like playing one on one with Jordan or a round of golf with jack,if you had the chance , you gotta take it
FWIW I wouldn't fkk her with Michelle Obama's dick.
 

GatorInGeorgia

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 25, 2014
6,340
7,068
The Muslim world were just heard collectively shouting "Allahu Akbar!"

Regardless, if this is her way of trying to escape a death sentence for wearing a hijab while performing in a porn flick, it won't work. ISIS will still kill her the first chance they get.

Wasn't her porn schtick, like, her starting out in a Hijab and then getting nailed by five jews and a pig while her husband, the Prophet Muhammad, flogs himself in the corner? Seems like she was kinda asking for a fatwa on her head.

Yes she was doing porn with a hijab on. ISIS not happy.

Don't get caught standing anywhere this girl or Salman Rushdie...could be very bad for your life expectancy.
 

rogdochar

Founding Member
RIP
Lifetime Member
Jun 14, 2014
25,397
29,513
Founding Member
Sorry Navet, but incorrect on pot's "organic" effect on the brain. And incorrect on my knowledge about the true effect of cannabis use on the structure & function of the brain. What's published for the general public is contaminated thinking, political thinking. {There are people who smoked tobacco their entire lives & never got cancer = are they the ones to be featured as spokespersons & the offered proof of the safety of tobacco?} There are a few solid scientists who are totally false when they say pot is safe to smoke routinely. If you smoke pot routinely, your brain will have the dead-spots like Alzheimer's patients. At a too early age you will become very forgetful. Example = very consistently you won't remember where you put your keys. This involves function failure probably of 2 neuronal path areas:
1) not placing your keys in your usual placement (a closed focus neuron highway of a functional action)
2) failure of short term memory neurons by getting too little oxygen to transmit the memory of where you did actually put your keys this time.)

Obvious evidence stares users right in the face = pot changes how you feel = that means it changes how areas of your brain functions. That change shows in functional SPECTS, fMRIs of the "potted" brain. SPECTS show pot's effect is to excessively increase the blood supply to the same pleasure neuron terminals as cocaine & heroine. In the long run -say 12 years of one/day use - that hogging of blood supply (to support increased neuron & synapse chemicals use) causes ischemia (oxygen deprivation) required to maintain neighboring other-purpose neurons and they die. On nuclear mapped brain scans these dead areas appear as an obvious "black hole" in the "photo" of the brain's organic structure. It's not really an organic hole, it's just a bankrupt & closed down "processing factory" where
no blood vessels are open, where no oxygen is flowing = dead and thus physiologically resorbed protein "piping". That valuable tissue is gone. Patients who are treated to abstain from pot for many follow-up years, may regenerate that area, (that area does your work in the learning process, in memory, in physical reflexes.)

Since this is exactly what shows up in all Alzheimer's brains (exactly in those spots locations of pot smokers), scientists have started controlled studies on pot smokers to see if a higher % get Alzheimer's and if pot smokers get Alzheimer's at a younger age? These are the people on the trail of the health-truth about smoking pot.

Anyway, I've studied brain function (essentially brain dysfunction) because my SPECTs show huge organic dents from a surprise hit from behind with a hard swung object. I was out for 3 hours. SPECT pictures of my brain show on the left a half an orange size loss of temporal lobe brain matter, with a rebound dent on the right temporal. I lost my working memory completely for years, very little has returned. Even today when I go to the sink to fill my water bottle up, I stand there stalled not remembering which handle is the hot or cold. I make a guess and mistakingly turn on the hot on many occasions, going on trial & error each time. Certain circuits were destroyed irretrievably, some were not.

Google this page of various ongoing research.>> .amenclinics.com/blog/marijuana-causes-long-term-brain-change. There are many brain research centers getting same results in their scientific studies.
 
Last edited:

NavetG8r

Founding Member
Stupid
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
16,720
16,674
Founding Member
Sorry Navet, but incorrect on pot's "organic" effect on the brain. And incorrect on my knowledge about the true effect of cannabis use on the structure & function of the brain. What's published for the general public is contaminated thinking, political thinking. {There are people who smoked tobacco their entire lives & never got cancer = are they the ones to be featured as spokespersons & the offered proof of the safety of tobacco?} There are a few solid scientists who are totally false when they say pot is safe to smoke routinely. If you smoke pot routinely, your brain will have the dead-spots like Alzheimer's patients. At a too early age you will become very forgetful. Example = very consistently you won't remember where you put your keys. This involves function failure probably of 2 neuronal path areas:
1) not placing your keys in your usual placement (a closed focus neuron highway of a functional action)
2) failure of short term memory neurons by getting too little oxygen to transmit the memory of where you did actually put your keys this time.)

Obvious evidence stares users right in the face = pot changes how you feel = that means it changes how areas of your brain functions. That change shows in functional SPECTS, fMRIs of the "potted" brain. SPECTS show pot's effect is to excessively increase the blood supply to the same pleasure neuron terminals as cocaine & heroine. In the long run -say 12 years of one/day use - that hogging of blood supply (to support increased neuron & synapse chemicals use) causes ischemia (oxygen deprivation) required to maintain neighboring other-purpose neurons and they die. On nuclear mapped brain scans these dead areas appear as an obvious "black hole" in the "photo" of the brain's organic structure. It's not really an organic hole, it's just a bankrupt & closed down "processing factory" where
no blood vessels are open, where no oxygen is flowing = dead and thus physiologically resorbed protein "piping". That valuable tissue is gone. Patients who are treated to abstain from pot for many follow-up years, may regenerate that area, (that area does your work in the learning process, in memory, in physical reflexes.)

Since this is exactly what shows up in all Alzheimer's brains (exactly in those spots locations of pot smokers), scientists have started controlled studies on pot smokers to see if a higher % get Alzheimer's and if pot smokers get Alzheimer's at a younger age? These are the people on the trail of the health-truth about smoking pot.

Anyway, I've studied brain function (essentially brain dysfunction) because my SPECTs show huge organic dents from a surprise hit from behind with a hard swung object. I was out for 3 hours. SPECT pictures of my brain show on the left a half an orange size loss of temporal lobe brain matter, with a rebound dent on the right temporal. I lost my working memory completely for years, very little has returned. Even today when I go to the sink to fill my water bottle up, I stand there stalled not remembering which handle is the hot or cold. I make a guess and mistakingly turn on the hot on many occasions, going on trial & error each time. Certain circuits were destroyed irretrievably, some were not.

Google this page of various ongoing research.>> .amenclinics.com/blog/marijuana-causes-long-term-brain-change. There are many brain research centers getting same results in their scientific studies.

Amenclinics.com? :lol: Good one rog. There are 3 entities fighting the hardest to prolong prohibition. Big pharma, big tobacco, and big religion. You're studying the opposition sources. Of course they're going to quote random government funded "studies". Government funded studies have proven over the years to be dominated by studies aimed at showing cannabis in a negative light. It's been that way for near a century now because of the DEA and how they only approve studies of cannabis that are specifically looking to discredit cannabis. Never trying to prove cannabis does anything good for people. You're only proving to me you have an agenda by quoting this garbage.


Two can play this game rog. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-marijuana-harm-the-brain/

The Claim
Casual cannabis use harms young people's brains.

The Facts
A study found differences in the brains of users and nonusers, but it did not establish that marijuana use caused the variations or that they had any functional significance.

The Caveats
The most obvious problem with leaping to that conclusion is that the scans were conducted at only one point. This approach can compare the two groups, but it cannot prove cannabis caused any differences between them—or even that the differences represent changes over time. They could be preexisting variations, or cannabis use and brain changes may both be related to a third factor, such as tobacco (although the study did attempt to take levels of smoking into account).

For every government funded study you can show me that supposedly proves cannabis is bad for you, I can find another done by a non-government group that says, nope, that actually doesn't prove it at all. Government studies have ALWAYS sought to prove cannabis is bad for you. Even if it meant lying about the number of people and control measures used.
 

rogdochar

Founding Member
RIP
Lifetime Member
Jun 14, 2014
25,397
29,513
Founding Member
Really, the top 10% of research neurologists and neurosurgeon researchers advancing knowledge about brain disorders are "cheating" on their diagnostic radioactive imaging to harm the sale of pot to fun-loving folk.

Superficial "reports" of studies tout that chronic pot smokers give performance results essentially equal to non-smokers. These reporters (some MDs who specialize in medical writing for the public) are telling you the truth, the "on-the-surface-truth"(superficial). The very very complex studies admit these similarity results that are the only ones mentioned in regular publication because to explain what the brain functions are doing learned from the nuclear brain scans would cause readers to put the article down. The chronic pot users' brains are using compensatory neuronal routes to make up for the proper routes that have been damaged. As their brains age, the scientists worry that noticeable differences will express to the extent of higher % Alzheimer's, more taxpayers' expense for homecare & round-the-clock home nursing for younger elderly mentally diseased . Deep medical scientists are laser focussed on stopping diseases that seem incurable that are advancing in damage. These doctors have no conspiracy.

When you see a stroke victim after much determined physical therapy "relearn" relearn to use his right hand to perform an old task, his arm moves awkwardly because the neuronal "trunk" that fired together to do it smoothly are dead, died from ischemia from the stroke. He has gone through physical therapy to "force" compensatory nerve firings to imitate his once fluid action. It's sad to watch but he can get his own glass of water.

PS>> Neurosciences now have conducted tests on subjects who were recruited as chronic users, then scanned, stopped cannabis use for 2 years and scanned showing improved functions i.e. firing along
the neuronal patterns of controls never exposed to cannabis to any brain-altered degree. Scientists are not blased about brain research. They've covered all angles. Remember, each unique approach research is a "trophy-project" for new scientist's curriculum vitae, notoriety among their peer group from France to Germany to Spain, Great Britain, Japan, USA. Finland, Norway, etc etc.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    31,642
    Messages
    1,615,560
    Members
    1,642
    Latest member
    fishermb