Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics' started by pilot-in-fla, Jun 9, 2018.
Woooah dislikes. Bwahaahaha.
He won't resign - because the absolute best they can hope for is finding him on some kind of technicality. Because there is not now, and there never has been any evidence of collusion with Russia. Russia tried to recruit a member of the Trump team. Interestingly enough, the FBI was trying to turn this exact same person. That's the extent of their operations within the Trump campaign itself. Have you not noticed that not a single person - not ONE has been charged with collusion? They took the highly questionable step of raiding and seizing records from the President's personal lawyer. If there was a case to be made, if there was a silver bullet, they would have had it. There's nothing there buddy. And if you're the type desperately hoping for something, you're going to be more disappointed than you were last election night. The reason they want an interview with the POTUS is to try and get him to lie about something, anything so they can charge him with that. If that strategy does not tell you where this investigation is at, I don't know what to tell you. If you're okay with that as a means of justice - you're a partisan hack and hopeless. For this as a means of "justice" I suggest you read "Three Felonies A Day" by Henry Silverglate who is the co-founder of the Foundation for Individual Rights. You sword you fashion can be the sword that stabs you. This has been from the very beginning a naked attempt to undermine the office. We have seen evidence of this in the forms of texts traded between people involved in the probe. This is public record. Look, I get you don't like the guy - but you have to stop letting him rent space in your head. If history is a guide for the midterms (and they generally follow certain trends) people leaning left are in for some major heartbreak in November.
I love these alternate reality people.
By the way, even though you were deflecting - this admission comes from Iran itself. The great deal maker gave piles of cash to people that helped facilitate 9/11. This isn't conspiracy theory; Iran has said it themselves.
Undermined him? He is an illegitimate president. My honest assessment. Let justice takes its due course.
All these ****lovers cant handle the fact that The **** lost bc she is, in fact, a ****, and the worst candidate to ever run. She was too arrogrant to even consider that the rust belt would vote republican, despite being warned by her pollsters she was in danger of losing Michigan and all the rest. Frankly she had to cheat to beat an semihomelesss socialist lunatic who used to write for Hustler Letters, did lose to a first term Senator whose resume said only "used to teach vote fraud to ACORN" and did lose to a WWF character.
It is. And Comey, McCabe and many others will soon be in prison. The **** may have statute of limitations on her side for many of the tens of thousands of felonies, but not destruction of evidence (clean them with a cloth?) and perjury. Those are slam dunk cases that the IJ will likely be referring in days.
The electoral college says otherwise. Look, it's clear you're not a person that is going to deal with facts. But here's a little test - this thread started about Iran. Fact 1: Iran has openly admitted to giving aid to the terrorists that carried out 9/11. Fact 2: President Obama negotiated a deal which released literally pallets full of cash to the Iranian government. Therefore, it is a true statement that Obama gave piles of cash to a government that facilitated 9/11. Neither of these facts can be disputed. Are you a reasonable person? Will you accept these facts? Here's a test - can you type the truth in a response? "Yes, Obama did in fact release large amounts of cash to a nation that facilitated 9/11..." You can then put your "but" or argument about that topic below it. Can you do that, or are you so disingenuous that you can't state things that are factually true and parts of the public record? If that's the case there really is nothing more to talk about because you're not operating on an intellectual level, just an emotional one. Which is fine, but I'm not going to waste my time with your feels.
Trump should willingly testify. Tell us what he knows. And let's see what happens. (We know what will happen).
You can't address the topic at hand, right? Okay, I thought not. Emotional thinker. Which is fine - but I'm not wasting my time on someone that can't be logical.
Op I got sidetracked a bit, but yeah - it is disturbing. One could argue that the POTUS didn't know about this at the time, but I find that unlikely given the operation Israel was able to pull off obtaining all of the classified information regarding the nuclear program which according to the deal and the POTUS they had not be pursuing in the first place. I think basically everyone knew that was a lie. As a condition of the deal they were supposed to get rid of all the material and facilities pertaining to a weapons program - which thanks to the Israeli operation we know they did not do. Basically we got nothing and gave a state sponsor of terror all over the Middle East and now, apparently the worst attack on US soil piles of cash a huge PR win and got absolutely nothing. Stunning diplomacy there.
Might be right, Obama and Iran is a manufactured scandal. I am not wasting my time on that. I want to talk about the Great Pretender.
Listen, I know the autoerotic death of Bourdain probably has your emotions a wreck this morning. Just get back to CNN and finish mourning with your fellow beta males. Gather yourself before you try to play with the big boys again.
I love your stupid unlikes.
That's not what this thread is about. Like I said - if you can't just say facts and instead have to chase conspiracies you're this guy: I'm done. I accept your admission that you're incapable of being a fair-minded person.
Your done after accepting my apology? Okay. Funny. Need to brush up on your reading comprehension. Not what I said.
Take your own advise. I rest my case:
So yes. Daddy got his belt and he humbled you in front of the nice people who will read this thread after us. Now he's going to have some lemonade.
Like to call yourself Daddy? Weird, but it takes all types. I am not here to judge.
You don't have the necessary permissions to use the chat.