5 Recruits? Actually, that isn't LOADING up at all.
Since, the list of "commits" being Florida heavy undercuts your argument of not recruiting Florida, you wish to criticize it for the quantity. That's how it works?
Or were you intending for your 'not recruiting Florida well enough' argument to be focused on the uncommitted kids? Because as I hear someone say frequently, how many of those are "committable offers"?
You mean all 35 don't have committable offers? Seems crazy.
While we may not lead for a lot of the uncommitted recruits in Florida, can you say we aren't giving offers - commitable or not? Or, does your argument then shift to them not being 5* studs? Actually, as I go back to the link T-Rex provided of the top recruits in the state of Florida, every single 5* has an offer from Florida, including those that are currently "committed" to other schools. What's your next argument, chief?
I'll concede not leading for these kids is an issue, but a temporary one that doesn't matter today - it matters on signing day, and that's when the criticism of our staff's ability to close the deal can be made. But I don't think it can be made today, not with the miracles they pulled last cycle going from 100 to a t20 class in a few weeks. But I don't believe ANYTHING the staff could possibly have done to date would satisfy some of our members.