Ok, I'm not trying to be insensitive, but the questions are just leaping off the page here. First of all, there are like 1,400 instances of fondling male students and 50 instances of rape. When exactly does fondling become rape, when the guy ejaculates? Or is it more something along the lines of, "Hey, I know you're only twenty, but you can never be too cautious when it comes to your prostate. I'm gonna need you to bend over here, don't be alarmed, the anal scapula I'm using will feel a lot like a throbbing male penis."
Secondly, what the heck kind of conversation was going on when the board gave this guy Emeritus status? I get that this is Ohio State and all, so lauding Lester the Molester doesn't surprise me, but I can't imagine that the multiple complaints of fondling didn't come up. Were they like, "Emeritus status? Hell, we ought to erect a statue of this guy. Have you ever gotten one of his handies? He puts a Korean massage parlor to shame."
Lastly, how is it possible that no one took a swing at this guy? Did he have bulked-up orderlies with prison tattoos holding his male patients down during the "exam?" Like any male, I've had a male doctor examine my junk. I felt nothing but sympathy for the guy. But if he'd done anything that would have given me even a mild boner, that sympathy would have rapidly changed to a sharp knee to the nasal septum, followed by a possible reverse suplex, depending upon the degree of the boner. When did we start teaching boys not to defend themselves?