- Jul 29, 2014
- 22,160
- 23,385
What the hell, it's off season so why not discuss.
Pro's. He has excellent size and strength and did turn a few screen passes into nice plays for us last year despite having some struggles carrying from the backfield. He's also far and away our best blocking RB on the roster.
Cons. He has only one year left and would have to learn a new position.
It just seems to me that our offense at times is severely lacking at the TE position. This is not a slight at Lewis/Goolsby types as they can be versatile weapons given certain coverages however their lack of blocking limits us getting equal numbers/leverage in short yardage situations. Also they really never have been reliable short yardage options as receivers due to their inability to fight their way through the los and into open space the way a conventional TE is supposed to on short yardage off of play action including goal line situations.
It just seems a waste of athletic ability to leave this guy #3 or #4 at RB instead of blending him in and out of the backfield for a different look , 1 back he could motion into the backfield as a blocking back or swing as a safety valve . No back looks he could motion into the backfield to pick up blitzes which almost always come off that look. I'm not sure if any of is even in our offensive braintrust vocabulary but I'm tired of not having more production from this position and without a true everydown bruiser of a TE I don't see anything different on the horizon.
Pro's. He has excellent size and strength and did turn a few screen passes into nice plays for us last year despite having some struggles carrying from the backfield. He's also far and away our best blocking RB on the roster.
Cons. He has only one year left and would have to learn a new position.
It just seems to me that our offense at times is severely lacking at the TE position. This is not a slight at Lewis/Goolsby types as they can be versatile weapons given certain coverages however their lack of blocking limits us getting equal numbers/leverage in short yardage situations. Also they really never have been reliable short yardage options as receivers due to their inability to fight their way through the los and into open space the way a conventional TE is supposed to on short yardage off of play action including goal line situations.
It just seems a waste of athletic ability to leave this guy #3 or #4 at RB instead of blending him in and out of the backfield for a different look , 1 back he could motion into the backfield as a blocking back or swing as a safety valve . No back looks he could motion into the backfield to pick up blitzes which almost always come off that look. I'm not sure if any of is even in our offensive braintrust vocabulary but I'm tired of not having more production from this position and without a true everydown bruiser of a TE I don't see anything different on the horizon.