Kobe Bryant killed in helicopter crash

Zambo

Founding Member
Poo Flinger
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
12,920
32,558
Founding Member
500 foot drop in 15 seconds... wow. That’s 33 ft/sec. @Zambo - does your body feel the difference between a drop like that and a rise at a similar rate? I just imagine feeling “your stomach in your throat” while dropping and feeling “sucked into your chair” while rising. Would 15 seconds be enough time to register and react to that drop?
A lot of the speed and descent rates that are normal for aircraft sound very large to the lay person. When you take off in an airliner you are climbing anywhere from 2000-4000 feet per minute and I've even exceeded 6000 fpm in light loaded aircraft. Similarly, when you start down in a normal idle descent from your 37k ft cruising altitude, its not uncommon to see over 3000fpm. ATC normally expects us to climb and descend at least 1000fpm in order to ensure vertical clearance with other aircraft in front of us. So 500 ft in 15 seconds may sound like a lot but you've done it plenty of times if you ever fly the airlines.

The thing that differs is the angle of descent, which obviously is much steeper in a slow flying aircraft for the same rate of descent. An airplane going 400 knots and descending at 1000fpm is doing so at a much shallower angle than an aircraft going 100 knots but descending at the same rate.
 

78

Founding Member
Dazed and Confused
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
19,749
27,640
Founding Member
The Hornets trade their No.13 pick of the 1996 draft to the Lakers for Vlade “the stiff” Divac, who use the pick to draft teenager Kobe Bryant.

A few weeks later the Lakers sign Shaq as a free agent.

Jeremy Foley was not the Lakers GM at the time.
 
Last edited:

SeabeeGator

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jan 2, 2018
7,032
10,100
A lot of the speed and descent rates that are normal for aircraft sound very large to the lay person. When you take off in an airliner you are climbing anywhere from 2000-4000 feet per minute and I've even exceeded 6000 fpm in light loaded aircraft. Similarly, when you start down in a normal idle descent from your 37k ft cruising altitude, its not uncommon to see over 3000fpm. ATC normally expects us to climb and descend at least 1000fpm in order to ensure vertical clearance with other aircraft in front of us. So 500 ft in 15 seconds may sound like a lot but you've done it plenty of times if you ever fly the airlines.

The thing that differs is the angle of descent, which obviously is much steeper in a slow flying aircraft for the same rate of descent. An airplane going 400 knots and descending at 1000fpm is doing so at a much shallower angle than an aircraft going 100 knots but descending at the same rate.
Your last paragraph makes sense. And I only ask because I know I can feel when the plane is dropping or rising on takeoff. I figured the pilot and passengers would’ve felt that descent. You think he recovers is if he doesn’t hit that ridge? At what point does a helo pilot start hovering and acknowledging sh*t is too dangerous?
 

Zambo

Founding Member
Poo Flinger
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
12,920
32,558
Founding Member
Your last paragraph makes sense. And I only ask because I know I can feel when the plane is dropping or rising on takeoff. I figured the pilot and passengers would’ve felt that descent. You think he recovers is if he doesn’t hit that ridge? At what point does a helo pilot start hovering and acknowledging sh*t is too dangerous?
Yeah it seems like simply slowing down and staying as low as you need to go to maintain ground contact would be the way out, although hovering isn't done as much as people think. Generally that is reserved for a short amount of time right over the landing spot with good visual reference to the ground. Even helicopters maintain forward speed while just "flying around." Think about police chases and such, the helos don't just hover out there they are always moving. You can see this guys ground track and notice while he was holding for 15 minutes waiting to proceed past Burbank and Van Nuys airports that he was flying around in circles rather than just sitting still. Obviously crashes like this aren't normal so clearly unless something was wrong with the bird the pilot did stuff that helo pilots don't normally do.
 

T REX

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2014
10,107
7,389
Founding Member
The helicopter company was not certified to fly in poor visibility.
The pilot flying the helicopter did not have the legal authority to navigate with his instruments because the aircraft owner did not have the necessary federal certification, according to three sources familiar with the charter helicopter company’s operations.

Island Express Helicopters, which owned the helicopter, had a Federal Aviation Administration operating certification that limited its pilots to flying under what are known as visual flight rules, or V.F.R., with at least three miles of visibility and a cloud ceiling no lower than 1,000 feet above the ground. The company did not have certification for its pilots to fly with instruments.

The helicopter had sophisticated instruments onboard that in other circumstances would allow for instrument flight, and the pilot was certified to fly by them. But because of the company’s certification limitations, he was required to fly only in conditions of sufficient visibility to navigate visually.
 

stephenPE

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Jul 20, 2014
20,410
15,412
The thing that differs is the angle of descent, which obviously is much steeper in a slow flying aircraft for the same rate of descent. An airplane going 400 knots and descending at 1000fpm is doing so at a much shallower angle than an aircraft going 100 knots but descending at the same rate.
This is off topic but I FINALLY got to see the movie Sully. Was it amazing that he put it down so safely in that river? Or was it something many pilots could do with no power? It seemed like the jet floated a long time for them to stand on the wings. Was he hammered like that in the inquiry in real life and proved the simulations were not correct. The movie was much different that thought it would be.
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,399
110,703
Founding Member
The helicopter company was not certified to fly in poor visibility.
The pilot flying the helicopter did not have the legal authority to navigate with his instruments because the aircraft owner did not have the necessary federal certification, according to three sources familiar with the charter helicopter company’s operations.
This was discussed earlier but you can't fly IFR from Kobe's house to Kobe's girl's game. IFR is from an airport to an airport. By their very nature, these prestige flights aren't IFR.

That being said, he was allowed to operate at or below 2500 feet and I'd think there were a lot less shyt to fly into at 2500 feet vs 1300.
 
Last edited:

CapitalGator02

Founding Member
( . Y . )
Jun 17, 2014
1,919
5,332
Founding Member
Im guessing that would have been exceedingly dangerous at the time of filming. I’m sure the instruments were not that advanced at the time.
Pilots and aircraft have been operating in IFR for decades with simplistic equipment with no issues. You can be decked out with the latest and greatest gear, but without proper training, all of that is irrelevant.

He didn't even have one of those terrain alert systems.
Island Express Helicopters, the owner of the helicopter that crashed, is only certified to operate flights under visual flight rules, meaning they can only operate when the cloud deck is at or above 1,000 feet and at least three miles of visibility. Why pay to install and maintain a Terrain Awareness and Avoidance Warning System when the company isn't certified to operate IFR flights? The pilot most likely knew he had terrain to the south which explains why he began to climb as he entered the turn. The issue is that he apparently lost control of the flight so a TAWS would've been useless in this particular instance.

I know he tried, if I understand it correctly, to go higher and was told they had commercial traffic in the way and then he asked for flight following and was advised he was too low for radar assistance. I assume that's the little bump up to 2000 feet likely because the fog was so bad and he was looking for a clear patch.
Burbank tower approved sVFR and instructed them to maintain an altitude at or below 2500' as they transited the departure paths of Burbank and Van Nuys to avoid departing traffic. Next, they were instructed to follow I-5 to State Route 118 then track highway 101 to their destination. As they begin their transit, the pilot reported to Van Nuys that they were currently at 1400' while the tower indicated overcast skies with a ceiling at 1100', visibility 2 1/2 miles and asks the pilot to report to Van Nuys ATC when they are in "VFR conditions." This means that well before they were anywhere near the 101 and headed westbound, they were already in IFR conditions. My guess is that they had difficultly identifying the 118 and 101 and reduced altitude as a result to gain visual of the roadways, which also put them too low for radar assistance.

I don't understand much about helicopters and I'm wondering if there's a reason why he was flooring it. I assume going slow in helicopter probably burns more fuel but if Wikipedia is correct he was almost at max speed. aircraft rarely traveled at Max speed, correct?
IMO, since they were placed in an unscheduled hold just southeast of BUR for 15 minutes, the pilot was trying to make up time once they were released from their hold.

You think he recovers is if he doesn’t hit that ridge? At what point does a helo pilot start hovering and acknowledging sh*t is too dangerous?
No chance. The combination of an increase in altitude while conducting a tight 180 turn in terrain with no visual references caused the pilot to lose control of the helicopter. Considering the fact they lost control during a turn, it's possible they barrel-rolled and crashed on their side or upside down, further reducing any possibility to recover.
 

78

Founding Member
Dazed and Confused
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
19,749
27,640
Founding Member
Another impressive take from Capital. I’m guessing you’re in the aviation industry in one form or another.
 

Zambo

Founding Member
Poo Flinger
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
12,920
32,558
Founding Member
As they begin their transit, the pilot reported to Van Nuys that they were currently at 1400' while the tower indicated overcast skies with a ceiling at 1100', visibility 2 1/2 miles and asks the pilot to report to Van Nuys ATC when they are in "VFR conditions." This means that well before they were anywhere near the 101 and headed westbound, they were already in IFR conditions.
You seem to have forgotten that pilots report their altitude in relation to sea level, while ceilings are reported with respect to ground level. Burbank and Van Nuys are around 800 feel above sea level, so an 1100' ceiling would be at around 1900 above sea level and about 500' above his stated altitude of 1400'.
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,399
110,703
Founding Member
You seem to have forgotten that pilots report their altitude in relation to sea level, while ceilings are reported with respect to ground level. Burbank and Van Nuys are around 800 feel above sea level, so an 1100' ceiling would be at around 1900 above sea level and about 500' above his stated altitude of 1400'.
So, I see VFR birds flying at night, especially law enforcement. I know they aren't always VFR but I also know they use GPS bc I've heard them asking for target coordinates.

Could this guy just have stayed at 2500 feet and used his GPS to follow the 101 or whatever? It seems like he was never going to be able to see the damn road regardless.
 

Zambo

Founding Member
Poo Flinger
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
12,920
32,558
Founding Member
So, I see VFR birds flying at night, especially law enforcement. I know they aren't always VFR but I also know they use GPS bc I've heard them asking for target coordinates.

Could this guy just have stayed at 2500 feet and used his GPS to follow the 101 or whatever? It seems like he was never going to be able to see the damn road regardless.
No idea what kind of gear this guy had in his aircraft. Could be anything from the latest space age heads up display, digital moving map, synthetic terrain display, etc,......or more likely he had an ipad with a navigation app on it such as ForeFlight. In any event if he was proficient at flying on instruments I'm sure he could have navigated internally via such stuff but it would be illegal as hell. Regardless, you have to maintain control of the aircraft. I don't think it was a navigation problem, I think he just lost control in the soup due to disorientation or some other problem. I don't think its a stretch to suppose that a helo pilot working for a company that isn't cleared for IFR operations has spent almost zero time recently in actual IMC (in the clouds).
 

deuce

Founding Member
"Cry 'Havoc!', and let slip the dogs of war."
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
6,895
6,165
Founding Member
When is the Coronation?
 

g8tr72

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 8, 2016
12,646
14,828
Live Public Memorial service. Appropriately held on 2/24

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    Birthdays

    Members online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    31,684
    Messages
    1,621,024
    Members
    1,643
    Latest member
    A2xGator