GatorKen714
Well-Known Member
- May 24, 2018
- 344
- 410
Yeah, that would be cool if we were in the ACC or Conf USA.It's a top 10 class better than 100+ other schools.
Yeah, more like a plan G. but we need a Plan Z for our plan G guys because we lose almost all of our Plan Gs.I thought dorlus was a plan C type guy?
I thought dorlus was a plan C type guy?
I don’t think it’s just crapping on a top 10 class. It’s more of 1) Alabama, Georgia, LSU, Texas AM are all out recruiting us in the past couple of classes. For a frame of reference if we were in any other conference it would be top 3. Yeah, the SEC recruiting the way it does makes getting a top 10 class look worse 2) we whiffed on every running back, that’s on Knox 3) the bad press saying we whiffed on everyone. Not a good look and the optics are bad on that one. I’ll end it with my favorite line, It is what it is....You Debbie Downers should find something else to crap on. It's a top 10 class better than 100+ other schools. The only thing that bothers me is why these Florida kids choose Georgia. No right minded Floridian likes Georgia.
You Debbie Downers should find something else to crap on. It's a top 10 class better than 100+ other schools. The only thing that bothers me is why these Florida kids choose Georgia. No right minded Floridian likes Georgia.
Agree on the lack of DT/SDE early. But there seems to be a shift in our focus.He was, and we missed on him. So instead of landing a Plan C we whiff and have to sign 6 in this class. Signing two heavy DLs (one has since transferred) in two years is as sh*tty as you can get at recruiting. I used him as an example, there's other positions of need that we've missed on as well.
He was, and we missed on him. So instead of landing a Plan C we whiff and have to sign 6 in this class. Signing two heavy DLs (one has since transferred) in two years is as sh*tty as you can get at recruiting. I used him as an example, there's other positions of need that we've missed on as well.
I think we all want to be #1 in the SEC. but with recruiting, what is the difference between 2&6? 3&7? How does the ranking actually correlate talent?Of the 14 SEC teams we finished 6th. That is the problem.
1 vs 3, not much. 1 and 3 vs 8? About 11 elite players vs 4, multiplied by 4 years.I think we all want to be #1 in the SEC. but with recruiting, what is the difference between 2&6? 3&7? How does the ranking actually correlate talent?
I think we all want to be #1 in the SEC. but with recruiting, what is the difference between 2&6? 3&7? How does the ranking actually correlate talent?
I have a hard time believing uga&lsu will each have 7 more elite players than us in this recruiting class.1 vs 3, not much. 1 and 3 vs 8? About 11 elite players vs 4, multiplied by 4 years.
then there is seriously no hope for you. none, whatsoever. dwags likely have more than that if we're being honest.I have a hard time believing uga&lsu will each have 7 more elite players than us in this recruiting class.
We finished 6th because some nerds evaluated high school kids and attempt to order them. I think rankings as a big picture are important, teams need talent. But how correctly can you quantify Broderick jones talent over issiah Walker's? Or elias Rick's over Jabari Rodgers? How does scheme fit at the next level play into how well talent is maximized? I dont think it's an exact science where one can quantify the difference.lets just pretend you didn't say this. To compete on the field you have to have the gain the talent off the field. We finished 6th, all the teams we are truly competing against for a spot at the top of the ladder are ahead of us, again.
Cmon, he picked out a number from thin air.then there is seriously no hope for you. none, whatsoever. dwags likely have more than that if we're being honest.
1 vs 3, not much. 1 and 3 vs 8? About 11 elite players vs 4, multiplied by 4 years.