- Jul 15, 2014
- 28,438
- 47,229
I really like the idea of the ported barrel, and I am a fan of anti-snag stuff, not a fan of those kind of sights, at all. I'd get the ported one, with the laser, and largely ignore the sights. I got the LCP with the laser, i don't worry about the sight picture. Honestly, with these types of weapons, I prefer the lasers to anything... with the laser/and even more traditional iron type sights, I'm not worried about an actual "perfect" (or even "good") sight picture. It's all muscle memory and practice... people spend too much time (and I'm talking fractions of a second) trying to make a final, perfect aim, before firing, and that fraction of a second is critical. Whether laser or "iron", I'm a bring up the muzzle/laser and i'm pressing off the first round even just before i "cover" my aiming point kind of guy. Cover, press, cover, press... i'm never waiting for my muzzle to settle or for a "perfect/even good" sight picture for a close fight (or even out to 75m with an M4). I'm sure it looks like my muzzle is never still when i fire. The sights on this SAS will fuk with ya for a fraction of a second, and i won't be a guy that buys something "you just have to get used to it" vs. EVERY other firearm you have or may pick up.What is the general consensus on the Sig P365 SAS with the embedded FTBullseye sights and ported barrel?
(note: SAS stands for Sig Anti Snag)
It looks extremely promising.
Again, everything I've heard about the 365 is good, and i think they should add the ported option to all of them. I don't think you could go wrong with this one, but with the laser.
PS I'm also not a fan of any weapon that i need even a penny to break down, but that's just dumb "old guy" on my part. I need a paper clip for my Kimbers, and while I hate that aspect of them, I do like the ones I have.