Diversity Studies Hoax

ChiefGator

A Chief and a Gator, Master of the Ignore list!!!!
Lifetime Member
Nov 9, 2015
7,401
4,168
There is corruption potentially in all studies, the issue is some can only get "peer review" while many in the hard sciences require experimental confirmation.

Now this is a bad in some way comparison, but we are in the political forum.

A female insists that a sexual abuse happened decades ago.

Under peer review other females would see if there was anything in there that was clearly wrong.

Under the opposite they would need objective evidence, or at least testimony that it was correct.

Large difference, and many studies in the soft sciences have been proven to be questionable if not wrong.
 

Theologator

Enchanter
Lifetime Member
Aug 11, 2015
8,298
15,923
There is corruption potentially in all studies, the issue is some can only get "peer review" while many in the hard sciences require experimental confirmation.

Now this is a bad in some way comparison, but we are in the political forum.

A female insists that a sexual abuse happened decades ago.

Under peer review other females would see if there was anything in there that was clearly wrong.

Under the opposite they would need objective evidence, or at least testimony that it was correct.

Large difference, and many studies in the soft sciences have been proven to be questionable if not wrong.

Well said, Chief!
 

ThreatMatrix

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 28, 2014
16,541
26,096
"What appears to be beyond dispute is that making absurd and horrible ideas politically fashionable can get them validated at the highest level of academic grievance studies".

What every conservative knows and every liberal refuses to admit.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    Birthdays

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    31,686
    Messages
    1,621,113
    Members
    1,643
    Latest member
    A2xGator