Do you think Mullen would win at UF?

g8r.tom

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Nov 17, 2017
3,375
4,291
Wonder why everyone wants me to go back to Swamp ? I did accomplish one thing. It brought most of you losers who questioned CDM ability to unite.
Need to get a shirt printed so you guys can wear it.
The “I don’t think Mullen is the right guy for UF club “

Misstating others opinions to make your seems reasonable always works out well..........
 

divits

Founding Member
A Muffin of the Studly Variety
Lifetime Member
Jun 13, 2014
12,702
22,997
Founding Member
New guy came in like

giphy.gif
:lmao:
 

neteng

Fuga!
Lifetime Member
Oct 15, 2018
6,084
16,194
Still dancing around... You got caught in a statement and can't give a yes or no answer to it. Do you think that with the talent that Butters had that he under performed at 4-7? Yes or no?



Not a troll, just pointing out how stupid and low the bar has been set for you for our program.

I answered your question but you can't seem to comprehend my answer. I even dumbed it down for you and you still can't get it. That, or probably more accurate, your just trolling.

So here it is for you again. YES (<-- dumbed down version given several responses back. Scroll up ... read ... comprehend before you reply again). The more indepth answer ... talent isn't the only factor that determines wins and losses. Getting all your talent in line and on the same page takes just as much coaching as it does to take the talent a player comes with to realize their true potential. It aint binary dude.

As for the second part about me being stupid and setting a low bar ... again, you can't comprehend a damn thing I write. I am talking about the floor and you are talking about the ceiling. From where we came (the floor), the Peach Bowl is a great accomplishment! That is the point. Nobody is setting a bar as if the Peach Bowl should be our goal every year. The comment of mine you leached onto and keep trying to pound your square peg into your round hole wasn't even talking about expectations and goals. It was a response to negative comment that degraded the performance of our teams accomplishment of turning the program around. It was about the floor and how far above it we got this season versus last season.

Funny thing is ... you are aggressively agreeing with me but you don't seem to understand it.

So to you ... all I say is ... #8.
 

neteng

Fuga!
Lifetime Member
Oct 15, 2018
6,084
16,194
But did you advocate for a 5th year?

Who knows ... another year of Chump versus getting Butters might have our reality right now a lot different. At this time, advocating to not give Chump a 5th year is advocating for Foley to hire Butters. But ... that is a red herring to what you are getting at that I do not really disagree with.
 

TheDouglas78

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
16,292
14,719
Founding Member
I answered your question but you can't seem to comprehend my answer. I even dumbed it down for you and you still can't get it. That, or probably more accurate, your just trolling.

No just fcking with someone I see is an apologist.

So here it is for you again. YES (<-- dumbed down version given several responses back. Scroll up ... read ... comprehend before you reply again). The more indepth answer ... talent isn't the only factor that determines wins and losses. Getting all your talent in line and on the same page takes just as much coaching as it does to take the talent a player comes with to realize their true potential. It aint binary dude.

Again, this is a dancing answer. it's yes, but not yes... because of reasons. It's yes or no... did he under perform with the talent he had. it was year three 60+% of the roster was his recruits. You are making excuses. It was Butters job to get the talent inline if he didn't, that is on coaching. If you are saying we had 9/10 win talent and the coach didn't put them in position to succeed. That is it, there is not other indepth to it.

I'm going to guess you were a butters apologist last year.

As for the second part about me being stupid and setting a low bar ... again, you can't comprehend a damn thing I write. I am talking about the floor and you are talking about the ceiling. From where we came (the floor), the Peach Bowl is a great accomplishment! That is the point. Nobody is setting a bar as if the Peach Bowl should be our goal every year. The comment of mine you leached onto and keep trying to pound your square peg into your round hole wasn't even talking about expectations and goals. It was a response to negative comment that degraded the performance of our teams accomplishment of turning the program around. It was about the floor and how far above it we got this season versus last season.

Nope, it's not. If the previous staff was so bad with talent that was obviously better than how it was coached. 9'/10 wins with our schedule should have been expected. This level of see how far we rose is you showing how far the bar has been lowered for you. Except you are so far down the rabbit hole you don't see it.
 

GR8 2B

A Florida Gator
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2016
4,055
5,356
:ohboy:

Muschump had the most injuries in the history of college football. He totally deserved a 4th year to even further destroy our beloved program.

Signed,
wingtee
T vs. tee might be fun.
 

neteng

Fuga!
Lifetime Member
Oct 15, 2018
6,084
16,194
No just fcking with someone I see is an apologist.



Again, this is a dancing answer. it's yes, but not yes... because of reasons. It's yes or no... did he under perform with the talent he had. it was year three 60+% of the roster was his recruits. You are making excuses. It was Butters job to get the talent inline if he didn't, that is on coaching. If you are saying we had 9/10 win talent and the coach didn't put them in position to succeed. That is it, there is not other indepth to it.

I'm going to guess you were a butters apologist last year.



Nope, it's not. If the previous staff was so bad with talent that was obviously better than how it was coached. 9'/10 wins with our schedule should have been expected. This level of see how far we rose is you showing how far the bar has been lowered for you. Except you are so far down the rabbit hole you don't see it.

So to play your silly game ... let me flip the scrip on you. You say 9-10 win season is expected. Stop dancing. Which is it? 9 or 10 wins? AND DON'T DANCE AROUND ANSWERING IT!!!!

Look ... talent is just talent. All it shows is potential (ceiling) and not realized results. Last season, we had the talent to go 4-7 because our players didn't realize all their potential. Its pretty obvious, especially after this season, that coaching was the biggest part of it. With the current roster, I dont think our talent is going to get us a much better outcome next year than we got this year. I think Mullen got just about everything he could out of this years talent. UK and Mizzou are hard to swallow but think he got more out of his talent than Coach O did of his against LSU. Year two is going to be a very telling year. Its hard to go through a process again with the same motivation that drove you before. I think next year is more about the players staying committed and truly wanting it than it is about Mullen 'coaching' it out of them. For us to make steps next year it will have to be because what we did this year becomes institutionalized.

That is what I am getting at ... it is dynamic and not a this or that type thing.
 

gatormandan

Are we back yet?
Lifetime Member
Oct 15, 2014
12,120
16,824
But Mac did, “ it was kinda cool wasn’t it “.. You are a bad azz with that name calling. Do you like calling someone a bad name then run behind you mothers skirt.?

Mac did? Hahahaha Mac was and is a total loser who never won jack and never will. As for my moms skirt, she died 10 years ago and I don't ever remember her wearing one. Now, how are those cupcakes turning out?
 

TheDouglas78

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
16,292
14,719
Founding Member
So to play your silly game ... let me flip the scrip on you. You say 9-10 win season is expected. Stop dancing. Which is it? 9 or 10 wins? AND DON'T DANCE AROUND ANSWERING IT!!!!

You're going to fun to play with.

Look ... talent is just talent. All it shows is potential (ceiling) and not realized results. Last season, we had the talent to go 4-7 because our players didn't realize all their potential.

If we had the talent to go 4-7 then the coaches did their job... what are you trying to say. If they reached their potential at 4-7, it's by good coaching.

Its pretty obvious, especially after this season, that coaching was the biggest part of it. With the current roster, I dont think our talent is going to get us a much better outcome next year than we got this year. I think Mullen got just about everything he could out of this years talent. UK and Mizzou are hard to swallow but think he got more out of his talent than Coach O did of his against LSU. Year two is going to be a very telling year. Its hard to go through a process again with the same motivation that drove you before. I think next year is more about the players staying committed and truly wanting it than it is about Mullen 'coaching' it out of them. For us to make steps next year it will have to be because what we did this year becomes institutionalized.

That is what I am getting at ... it is dynamic and not a this or that type thing.

No, you are making excuses. It's a coaches job to get the most of the talent. Dude you really enjoy talking in circles... because you make an argument, then back track. The disprove your own argument. Mullen gets to year 3, at that point 60+% of the roster will be his recruits. The issue I have is you comparing it to last season. Last season was the exception not the rule. The talent last year should have won 9/10 games, but didn't due to coaching. This year we did. The question comes in is Mullen going to get us talent that we aren't 9/10 win team, but a 12/14 win team.
 

AuggieDosta

I Don't Re Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 1, 2018
7,448
11,999
Personally, I think Ox brought Wing in to get us over the millionth post!

Keep at em Wing! You'll be fine here. :clap:
 

neteng

Fuga!
Lifetime Member
Oct 15, 2018
6,084
16,194
You're going to fun to play with.



If we had the talent to go 4-7 then the coaches did their job... what are you trying to say. If they reached their potential at 4-7, it's by good coaching.



No, you are making excuses. It's a coaches job to get the most of the talent. Dude you really enjoy talking in circles... because you make an argument, then back track. The disprove your own argument. Mullen gets to year 3, at that point 60+% of the roster will be his recruits. The issue I have is you comparing it to last season. Last season was the exception not the rule. The talent last year should have won 9/10 games, but didn't due to coaching. This year we did. The question comes in is Mullen going to get us talent that we aren't 9/10 win team, but a 12/14 win team.

You are either a fvvking moron or a troll. Most likely, a moron troll.
 

neteng

Fuga!
Lifetime Member
Oct 15, 2018
6,084
16,194
You're going to fun to play with.



If we had the talent to go 4-7 then the coaches did their job... what are you trying to say. If they reached their potential at 4-7, it's by good coaching.

And obviously, with horrible coaching we had the talent to go 4-7. Though, I think Butters could have squeezed another loss in there. So I would probably say we had the talent to go 3-7 last year. At that point ... I just dont think Butters could even F it up more than that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.