Vandy doesn't play us tough every year

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,161
109,975
Founding Member
This ignorant statement gets repeated by every moron almost every year.

Sometimes it gets repeated by "even SOS struggled against Vandy". We've done it before but here we go:
1990-91 did not play
1992 41-21
1993 52-0
1994 24-7
1995 38-7
1996 28-21 **** THERE YA GO. THEY PLAYED US CLOSE UNDER SOS!!!!
1997 20-7
1998 45-13
1999 13-6 *** ONE MORE WOOT!
2000 43-20
2001 71-13
So Vandy played us close in 1996 and 1999 under SOS, hardly often.

2002 21-17 **** ZOOKER TIME
2003 35-17
2004 34-17
Same same under Zookie, one close game.


2005 49-42 **** CUM'S FIRST YEAR, VANDY HAD THAT NFL QB
2006 25-19 ***
2007 49-22
2008 42-14
2009 27-3
2010 55-14
So, they played CUM close in 05 and 06. Hardly often.

2011 26-21 *** UNTIL HE DOESNT
2012 31-17
2013 17-34 *** LOL BUT PUMPERS SAY NO ONE CAN WIN WITH ALL THE INJURIES CHIMP'S TEAM HAD
2014 34-10
Played us close 2 out of 4 times vs Dwagchump.


2015 9-7 *** A BUTTERIFFIC GAME FOR SURE
2016 13-6 *** MORE BUTTERIFFIC
2017 38-24
I guess two out of three equals usually playing us close under Butters too.

2018 37-27
2019 56-0


No, they don't always play us close. They certainly didnt always play us close under SOS. They play us close every now and then, and usually only when we have a garbage coach.
 
Last edited:

78

Founding Member
Dazed and Confused
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
19,745
27,635
Founding Member
I smell a setup.
 

GatorInGeorgia

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 25, 2014
6,340
7,068
This ignorant statement gets repeated by every moron almost every year.

Sometimes it gets repeated by "even SOS struggled against Vandy".

Probably the same people that say Kentucky plays us close every year. I debunked that one a few weeks back. Thanks for debunking the Vandy myth.
 

78

Founding Member
Dazed and Confused
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
19,745
27,635
Founding Member
We’re a juggernaut.
 

Minister of Information

Highly Cosmopolitan
Aug 17, 2018
840
1,015
Getting back to reality, the statement was made that Vandy has been consistently “destroyed” by all quality UF coaches. I take issue with that. Let’s assume that destroyed is equivalent to blown out. Well what is meant by blown out? I await your definitions, but in the meanwhile allow me to suggest a few principles (though principles are admittedly an unusual commodity in certain quarters, but I digress):

1. The margin of victory should exceed the losing team’s score.
2. The margin of victory should exceed 21 points.
3. The contest should have become uncompetitive before the fourth quarter.

Sound reasonable?

Let’s apply those suggestions to the record of SOS and UM vs Vandy. What do we discover?

SOS 10-0 vs Vandy
5 blowout victories

UM 6-0 vs Vandy
4 blowout victories

UM consistently blew out Vandy. He also had 2 close games. SOS did not consistently blow out Vandy. A couple of those games are on the margin of blowing out. Two games were legitimately close. 1-3 others were legitimately competitive.

This case rests, mother f u cker.
 

TLB

Just chillin'
Lifetime Member
Jan 6, 2015
13,740
25,360
I'm just glad Vandy didn't play us tough again this year. We need a break from the cardiac comeback kids we've had to deal with over the years.
 

deuce

Founding Member
"Cry 'Havoc!', and let slip the dogs of war."
Lifetime Member
Jun 11, 2014
6,891
6,162
Founding Member
So........... what is the over/under?
 

Ancient Reptile

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2015
10,796
11,119
This ignorant statement gets repeated by every moron almost every year.

Sometimes it gets repeated by "even SOS struggled against Vandy". We've done it before but here we go:
1990-91 did not play
1992 41-21
1993 52-0
1994 24-7
1995 38-7
1996 28-21 **** THERE YA GO. THEY PLAYED US CLOSE UNDER SOS!!!!
1997 20-7
1998 45-13
1999 13-6 *** ONE MORE WOOT!
2000 43-20
2001 71-13
2002 21-17 **** ZOOKER TIME
2003 35-17
2004 34-17
2005 49-42 **** CUM'S FIRST YEAR, VANDY HAD THAT NFL QB
2006 25-19 ***
2007 49-22
2008 42-14
2009 27-3
2010 55-14 EVEN CHIMP KILLS VANDY
2011 26-21 *** UNTIL HE DOESNT
2012 31-17
2013 17-34 *** LOL BUT PUMPERS SAY NO ONE CAN WIN WITH ALL THE INJURIES CHIMP'S TEAM HAD
2014 34-10
2015 9-7 *** A BUTTERIFFIC GAME FOR SURE
2016 13-6 *** MORE BUTTERIFFIC
2017 38-24
2018 37-27
2019 pending

No, they don't play us close MOST of the time. They play us close every now and then, and usually only when we have a garbage coach.
Guess we don't have a garbage coach.
 

Ancient Reptile

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2015
10,796
11,119
This ignorant statement gets repeated by every moron almost every year.

Sometimes it gets repeated by "even SOS struggled against Vandy". We've done it before but here we go:
1990-91 did not play
1992 41-21
1993 52-0
1994 24-7
1995 38-7
1996 28-21 **** THERE YA GO. THEY PLAYED US CLOSE UNDER SOS!!!!
1997 20-7
1998 45-13
1999 13-6 *** ONE MORE WOOT!
2000 43-20
2001 71-13
2002 21-17 **** ZOOKER TIME
2003 35-17
2004 34-17
2005 49-42 **** CUM'S FIRST YEAR, VANDY HAD THAT NFL QB
2006 25-19 ***
2007 49-22
2008 42-14
2009 27-3
2010 55-14 EVEN CHIMP KILLS VANDY
2011 26-21 *** UNTIL HE DOESNT
2012 31-17
2013 17-34 *** LOL BUT PUMPERS SAY NO ONE CAN WIN WITH ALL THE INJURIES CHIMP'S TEAM HAD
2014 34-10
2015 9-7 *** A BUTTERIFFIC GAME FOR SURE
2016 13-6 *** MORE BUTTERIFFIC
2017 38-24
2018 37-27
2019 pending

No, they don't play us close MOST of the time. They play us close every now and then, and usually only when we have a garbage coach.
Guess we don't have a garbage coach.
 

Minister of Information

Highly Cosmopolitan
Aug 17, 2018
840
1,015
Youre such a fvkking idiot. 41-21 is "playing us close" huh?

Go away.

You’re such a coward. I realize you’re a lawyer in the habit of murdering truth and disregarding every vestige of honor, but would it really harm you psychologically to consider the arguments of your opponents in their own right, without the need to lie about them?

So no, losing by 20 is obviously not legitimately close, nor did I say that it was. But it might be legitimately competitive depending on how the game played out, as I made clear with the “1-3” range. The margin was less than their score in 1992, so it’s conceivable that the game was “legitimately competitive.”

You don’t have to lie to win arguments, as s hole. You might even be right, I’ll let the public be the judge. I don’t find it anathema to my further existence that I could possibly be proven wrong. How else do you learn anything new?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    31,642
    Messages
    1,615,648
    Members
    1,642
    Latest member
    fishermb