Recruiting NSD 2020 Thread: Zach Evans goes to TCU

TheDouglas78

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
16,324
14,771
Founding Member
We finished 6th because some nerds evaluated high school kids and attempt to order them. I think rankings as a big picture are important, teams need talent. But how correctly can you quantify Broderick jones talent over issiah Walker's? Or elias Rick's over Jabari Rodgers? How does scheme fit at the next level play into how well talent is maximized? I dont think it's an exact science where one can quantify the difference.

So what you are saying are people who see these athletes on a decent basis, in camps where they compete against one another, their measurables, etc... have no clue what they are doing? They haven't done their job with enough expertise over decades of data points out there that they are going to be more right than wrong? That the specialization of the recruiting, through the camps, film, organizations might not have a good clue?

When you continually get the types of lower graded talent, you might have one or two that break the mold, but overall the statistic is fairly accurate. Now over the 4 years that difference becomes more noticeable because as your talent starts to reach the potential of their grade, so does theirs.

UGA has an average player grade of 3.96 where is ours is 3.7... are you saying that doesn't matter. That the services with all the data they collect are going to be so wrong that UGA completely over recruited inferior talent and we got gems on every level. If so can you share the crack you are smoking, because that is some good stuff
 

TheDouglas78

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
16,324
14,771
Founding Member
The “multiplied by 4 years” is what it’s all about. It’s tough to overcome having less talent overall, and recruiting momentum is huge.

Obviously, having 10-11 win seasons doesn’t cure all recruiting ills.

that's because a 10-11 win season is like having a 8-9 win season in the mid 90s.
 

T REX

Founding Member
Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2014
10,107
7,389
Founding Member
We finished 6th because some nerds evaluated high school kids and attempt to order them. I think rankings as a big picture are important, teams need talent. But how correctly can you quantify Broderick jones talent over issiah Walker's? Or elias Rick's over Jabari Rodgers? How does scheme fit at the next level play into how well talent is maximized? I dont think it's an exact science where one can quantify the difference.

"trust the coaches"

There are countless studies that prove you need bluechip talent to win. Period. It's empirical data not anything made up.

Are you just trolling?
 

Durty South Swamp

Founding Member
doodley doodley doo!
Lifetime Member
Jun 19, 2014
21,436
47,946
Founding Member
trashcan is one of those true believer types. for him evidence of his position is not required, and no amount of objective, quantifiable data that says otherwise is sufficient.
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,405
110,710
Founding Member
"trust the coaches"

There are countless studies that prove you need bluechip talent to win. Period. It's empirical data not anything made up.

Are you just trolling?
No, no. He isnt trolling. Just Trust The Coach Pumpers have three general periods:

before signing day we are in the "#SecretCommits and We Gettin Errbody" period.

after signing day we are in me "3 Star Whisperin and Coach Dont Need No Talent" period.

in October we are in the "Well, Coach ___ Was EXPECTED to Lose BC We Have Less Talent" period.

overall it's part of wait till next year syndrome.
 

Durty South Swamp

Founding Member
doodley doodley doo!
Lifetime Member
Jun 19, 2014
21,436
47,946
Founding Member
in October we are in the "Well, Coach ___ Was EXPECTED to Lose BC We Have Less Talent" period.
Seems to be more like, "you guys can't expect him to win all the time when he doesn't have the talent" or the classic "his players" line. But perhaps I'm splitting hairs here.

It does seem to be a common refrain. "Just wait until NSD, you'll see." During NSD, "well what do you expect with limited facilities, poor staff, admin commitment issues, etc." 2 weeks after NSD and until the season starts, "crootin rankings don't matter, we got diamonds in the rough, saving spots for a big haul next year, he knows what he's doing, etc." Then the season starts and it eventually comes around full circle.
 

neteng

Fuga!
Lifetime Member
Oct 15, 2018
6,085
16,195
No, no. He isnt trolling. Just Trust The Coach Pumpers have three general periods:

before signing day we are in the "#SecretCommits and We Gettin Errbody" period.

after signing day we are in me "3 Star Whisperin and Coach Dont Need No Talent" period.

in October we are in the "Well, Coach ___ Was EXPECTED to Lose BC We Have Less Talent" period.

overall it's part of wait till next year syndrome.

You are a putz.

Remind me what you predicted our record would be last season?

And maybe you should start saying 4 Star Whisperer considering 17 of the 23 signed are 4 star or higher.

Also ... we added four (4) 5 Stars to the team this cycle.

You are stoopid.
 

SeabeeGator

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jan 2, 2018
7,032
10,100
trashcan is one of those true believer types. for him evidence of his position is not required, and no amount of objective, quantifiable data that says otherwise is sufficient.
Nah, I think he is just a contrarian. Likes to mess with you guys.
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,405
110,710
Founding Member
Nah, I think he is just a contrarian. Likes to mess with you guys.
no that's you oh, you will quietly sometimes admit you agree with our takes but you loudly play contrarian just for the fun of it, which I respect of course.

garbage can boy is just trust the coaches guy hundred percent.
.
 

Oscar the G

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2018
574
178
Nah, I think he is just a contrarian. Likes to mess with you guys.
Not trying to be contrarian, and any fool can see I said recruiting is important. But going back to post #455, what really is the difference between a 5.8 and a 5.9?
 

SeabeeGator

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jan 2, 2018
7,032
10,100
no that's you oh, you will quietly sometimes admit you agree with our takes but you loudly play contrarian just for the fun of it, which I respect of course.

garbage can boy is just trust the coaches guy hundred percent.
.
I’m a moderate. I agree with some but not to the extreme that you do. I’m also not convinced CDM can not win here like you guys.
 

Oscar the G

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2018
574
178
So what you are saying are people who see these athletes on a decent basis, in camps where they compete against one another, their measurables, etc... have no clue what they are doing? They haven't done their job with enough expertise over decades of data points out there that they are going to be more right than wrong? That the specialization of the recruiting, through the camps, film, organizations might not have a good clue?

When you continually get the types of lower graded talent, you might have one or two that break the mold, but overall the statistic is fairly accurate. Now over the 4 years that difference becomes more noticeable because as your talent starts to reach the potential of their grade, so does theirs.

UGA has an average player grade of 3.96 where is ours is 3.7... are you saying that doesn't matter. That the services with all the data they collect are going to be so wrong that UGA completely over recruited inferior talent and we got gems on every level. If so can you share the crack you are smoking, because that is some good stuff
I read all the time about recruiting services bumping uga and fsu guys. Do we think that really happens or is it just sour grapes?

If you took that I said the recruiting analysts at rivals, 247, etc have no clue then you werent paying attention. I'm saying these services are definitely able to decipher talent (for the most part). But what are the levels of talent? No one wants to be 6th in the SEC. but does that accurately depict the talent gap? (As decided by a for profit company) I'm saying what is the actual difference between a 3.9 player and a 3.7?
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,405
110,710
Founding Member
Not trying to be contrarian, and any fool can see I said recruiting is important. But going back to post #455, what really is the difference between a 5.8 and a 5.9?
5.8 and 5.9, yes. 6.0 and 6.1 too.

5.8 and 5.7, not really. The curve is getting really fat there.

Most of the 5* and high 4* fail at approximately the same rate, statistically, no matter how you define fail whether it's failed a start fail to make all-conference as the stars would predict, failed to get drafted in the NFL, whatever. (It is still like 50%, no one is saying.coaching and development dont matter.)

Butters lived in the LOW 3* zone, 5.5 and 5.6, the high 3* low 4* zone like Mullinz. Those guys have a very high "fail rate".

This is where those "3.5" gpa means little, bc they dont reflect those low 3* sunbelters as being different than the high 3* DE that Bammer also had interest as a plan B or Plan C.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.