- Jun 12, 2014
- 8,952
- 32,411
Founding Member
No offense taken. I don’t think there’s a lot to talk about from an x/o standpoint. I think he’s probably trying to rely on the DEs to at a minimum pressure the QB, but if they don’t get it done then it becomes the safeties‘ duty to help over the top, which ours are inconsistent to poor at in this aspect. What I recall seeing too often are our safeties taking too long to read and recognize and then not being able to get in coverage. Instead of reading as they sink, they stand flat-footed (squat) more often than not. I think this is how we get beat by the teams with better QBs and OLs.No offense but this isn't new. Third and Grantham has been a thing for a decade, and he had future NFLers at every position at Georgia.
I just wondered if there's something X's and O's that you see.
The neverending blitz is fun, but on third-and-long when it's an obvious blitz situation he can't get it done. We still blitz some and we play a lot of soft shell some but he's not particularly good at either when the offense knows the blitz is coming.
DCs will often have a chip on their shoulder from the responsibility of getting out of messes created by the offenses. This can lead to a little fear of an O catching you in a blitz and exploiting it. The natural response is to count on your defenders to be sound and at a minimum keep the ball in front of the secondary. Live to play another down and be ok if they are inside the 20 where the secondary is condensed and coverage is “easier.” Grantham’s plan works better against equal and lesser teams, but it isn’t consistently lock down even then. This brings us back to personnel, particularly safeties. Poor techniques and recognition kill us when the QB has time and the opponents get a route that features a clean release, allowing the receiver to get up to speed quickly.
I’m no fan of Mickey Andrews, but he always had a good plan on third down that involved press coverage and a strong blitz (usually two more than you could account for with blockers that came from a variety of angles). I’d love to see more than just a sampling of this from us.