- Jun 14, 2014
- 25,397
- 29,513
Founding Member
Have you ever considered a career in proctology?
What.!! And put his student loans in arrears.?
Have you ever considered a career in proctology?
I gave you a like for Jimbo Fisher and goat phukk being in the same sentence.I totally agree that there is plenty of blame to go around. If the NCAA hadn't been so unbelievably stupid and greedy we may have avoided this schytfest. But while we're at it, don't forget the likes of Jimbo Fisher, et al, for turning what could have been a manageable accommodation into a total goat phukk. I'm sure there are other factors, but I'm too lazy and butt hurt to think about it anymore.
For real. We didn't create this situation. We've been supportive for years through crap decisions and coaches.Fcukers aren't getting any of my money
the topic is about whether ppl like you or I should feel obligated or guilt tripped into giving money to some "collective" that eventually makes it's way into players hands. I'm a simple man, but I fail to see why I should pay someone who doesn't work for me, to do something. If we're going to spin this as "capitalism", then my right to keep my money in my pocket is just as legitimate as yours to fork it out for some college kids playing a game.What the Fuchs does that have to do with anything?
What a travesty supply and demand is, right?
I often cry myself to sleep thinking of the terrible evils capitalism has wrought upon us.
First u'd have to have some.Fcukers aren't getting any of my money
You got that part right.I don’t know
You got that part right.
The supreme court ruling doesn't have anything to do with the players being exploited, the value of scholarships or what the kids "deserve."
The NCAA can still tell the teams that they can't pay the players, and they can still regulate the scholarships and what they include.
The SCOTUS ruling said that they can't stop a player from selling his autograph or letting the local car dealership pay a player to use his image in an ad on the basis that it violates antitrust laws.
MJMs point was that if the NCAA had allowed it to some extent in a controlled way, it wouldn't have gotten to the supreme court and the ruling that effectively ends any chance of the NCAA having any say whatsoever.
Regardless of whether it had any merit, the end result which is now known is that they have no control whatsoever. Hindsight being 20/20 we can now see it was a poor decision by the NCAA.I’m saying that the resistance from the NCAA to open things up in “a controlled setting” absolutely had merit.
Regardless of whether it had any merit, the end result which is now known is that they have no control whatsoever. Hindsight being 20/20 we can now see it was a poor decision by the NCAA.
This is exactly one of the points people don't consider. The kids need the schools far more than the school needs the kids. The level of competition is inconsequential to a point. Florida fans will still watch Florida Football and the same with other schools. Just take a look at high school stadiums across the country. Hell, more people attend Miami HS games on Friday night than UM games on Saturday. So UF would still have TV contracts and merchandising flying off the shelves, provided that other schools were on the same level.I’m not sure I’ve got a good grasp on NIL, but I think the antitrust issue was coming eventually. Wouldn’t the restraint of a player from reaping the benefit of his NIL for the sake of competitive balance when you control the market would require an antitrust exemption?
That’s one thing for AR, who could easily get a car dealership sponsorship, as he has. But that Maryland DT - who ever heard of him before he hit the portal? Does he add value to da u or are they adding value to him? Teams offering a means to broker that value seems inevitable, but how does that not become an auction house? A star or even a member of the team at Bama’s value vs. a star at Vandy? That’s real. The gap only widens.
Just thinking out loud…learning from you all.
Well, there is that...First u'd have to have some.
If you despise them so much, why tune in every Saturday and cheer for them?If I want to support an illiterate who has no business being on campus, I'll find Sally Struthers.
I think it's pretty clear what they were doing was unlawful. But someone still has to challenge it in the courts. If the NCAA had allowed it in a controlled way, would they have been challenged? We'll never know at this point.Wouldn’t the restraint of a player from reaping the benefit of his NIL for the sake of competitive balance when you control the market would require an antitrust exemption?
Regardless of whether it had any merit, the end result which is now known is that they have no control whatsoever. Hindsight being 20/20 we can now see it was a poor decision by the NCAA.
I've got at least $12 in my piggy bankFirst u'd have to have some.
INTERWEB WINNNER.I think the collective should be paying us reparations for the last decade.