It’ll be 4 after Trask beats Franks and Jones out to assume the starting job next season.
I'm penciling in Franks for the next two.It’ll be 4 after Trask beats Franks and Jones out to assume the starting job next season.
Yes, and Tebow had 2 and was screwed.Should be 4: Grossman got jobbed
He did? Where was I for #2?Yes, and Tebow had 2 and was screwed.
Yes, and Tebow had 2 and was screwed.
I would agree with that. Tim's 2009 wasn't too shabby either.Yeah we should honestly have five.
Tebow had the most 1st-place votes yet was deliberately left completely off a whole bunch of ballots so he wouldn’t win again.
The scumbags who did that should have had their voting privileges pulled.
Tebow had the most 1st-place votes yet was deliberately left completely off a whole bunch of ballots so he wouldn’t win again.
The scumbags who did that should have had their voting privileges pulled.
Yeah, but it's not the point. He was deliberately and blatantly screwed, and they weren't even apologetic about it. He was absolutely and without question the best player in college football in 2008.The midwest schools took a page out of the hillbilly’s playbook (remember the ‘95 “coach’s” poll?).
I’m guessing Timmy was okay with the consolation prize he won in miami... against bradford.
Tebow's numbers were outstanding, esp when you factor in 673 rushing yards and 12 touchdowns for a total of 42 touchdowns.I’m
Yeah, but it's not the point. He was deliberately and blatantly screwed, and they weren't even apologetic about it. He was absolutely and without question the best player in college football in 2008.
I’m
Yeah, but it's not the point. He was deliberately and blatantly screwed, and they weren't even apologetic about it. He was absolutely and without question the best player in college football in 2008.
It was deliberate and it was widely known at the time. MANY from the Big 12 region voted Bradford, McCoy and then Crabtree or Harrell to ensure Tebow didn’t win in a landslide over Bradford. Absolute sham and a total lack of integrity IMO.Tebow's numbers were outstanding, esp when you factor in 673 rushing yards and 12 touchdowns for a total of 42 touchdowns.
But I'd fall short of calling it a deliberate screw job. Bradford had crazy numbers, including 50 touchdowns, after the regular season.
What we now know that the Heisman voters didn't know was that Tebow would lead Florida past Bradford's Oklahoma in the BCS title game.
Okay, what was the voting from the SEC region? Just curious.It was deliberate and it was widely known at the time. MANY from the Big 12 region voted Bradford, McCoy and then Crabtree or Harrell to ensure Tebow didn’t win in a landslide over Bradford. Absolute sham and a total lack of integrity IMO.