- Jun 5, 2014
- 37,012
- 97,997
Founding Member
You should be careful not to alienate the few people that agree with you on this board.Ooops!!
You should be careful not to alienate the few people that agree with you on this board.Ooops!!
.............
We’ll see zone a lot as long as Danno M continues to run ~60% of the time, run about 58 plays a game, and we have a QB that isn’t pressuring the defense downfield in the seams and deep middle. Trask being unproven and perhaps likely to throw picks only increases that chance of seeing zone, not the opposite.
Even LSU may play us more zone than most other teams they play, and they are very man heavy.
The one aspect that makes zone less needed is Trask may not run much so the db’s backs turned in man isn’t too concerning. If EJ plays, we may see even more zone or combo D’s with under zones or a spy.
You should be careful not to alienate the few people that agree with you on this board.
It was a joke, Bush. Try decaf.I don't seek agreement with people who don't know what they are talking about.
If you want some credibility, go to your local high school and volunteer to be coach instead of typing on a message board. Until then..............
It was a joke, Bush. Try decaf.
I don't seek agreement with people who don't know what they are talking about.
If you want some credibility, go to your local high school and volunteer to be coach instead of typing on a message board. Until then..............
Everything you said here is the complete opposite of why a team will run zone coverage against an offense. You play zone mainly when you don't have the personnel to man up against 4 receivers/TEs that will likely play in the NFL. Not too many teams left on our schedule that can man up 4 across with a safety and not get toasted.
I don't seek agreement with people who don't know what they are talking about.
If you want some credibility, go to your local high school and volunteer to be coach instead of typing on a message board. Until then..............
We are running QB so often and may have a QB who can't pick up complicated zones because he has never played against any (I doubt they ran much zone blitz or combo defenses in pee wee or middle school), then no, my post is not the opposite of why you might play zone. Rather than having your safeties and corners/nickel with their backs to the line of scrimmage due to our 4 9 routes when we are going to run the ball at them 60% of the time, particularly with this qb, you may want your db's facing the play.
It's ok, I'll see if our local HS needs more volunteers and send your name in case they need someone to argue over a non-dispute at staff meetings.
Sabanesque (and the zillion variations now) zones are so different than what we grew up with, which for me was Woody Hayeseque just keep it in front of you zone. I agree w you completely.You simply are ignorant. You can play man and keep you front to the qb long enough to determine run or pass. But you sound like every other dumbass on a message board that thinks man is lining up press an jamming on the line, which could also be zone coverage.
A lot of people here are allergic to informed opinions and viewpoints. It's a strange place.You simply are ignorant. You can play man and keep you front to the qb long enough to determine run or pass. But you sound like every other dumbass on a message board that thinks man is lining up press an jamming on the line, which could also be zone coverage.
I have 2 state title rings that prove I know what I am talking about and I have a job as a DC on Friday night. You might try chk out the local rec league and get some experience. It's obvious you have none.
Why would you want to be a part of a place like that? We will miss you, but you’re simply too good for us.A lot of people here are allergic to informed opinions and viewpoints. It's a strange place.
Someone has to help you silly kids understand football.Why would you want to be a part of a place like that? We will miss you, but you’re simply too good for us.