- Jun 13, 2014
- 872
- 1,304
Founding Member
Hard to believe he wouldn't want to be part of this merry bandHard as it might be to understand, not every kid in Florida is a Gator Fan.
Hard to believe he wouldn't want to be part of this merry bandHard as it might be to understand, not every kid in Florida is a Gator Fan.
How in hell is this kid a 4 star? I've watched every available tape and I refuse to believe he's a 4 star. He's fine going north/south, but is incredibly stiff when asked to go sideline to sideline. Houston IV, which is a 3 star, has a much better shuttle time and really can go sideline to sideline.
I think most folks go by Rivals - there's a pecking order, but Rivals always seems to be the one folks trust most.Question ...do you go by 24/7 or Rivals rankings?
I would agree. Rivals has been traditionally the most accurate, while Scout has been the most unreliable. However, listening to some trusted sources lately, I'm hearing that Rivals Rankings are rigged in some way. I still pay attention to Rivals first, but I no longer take it as gospel. ESPN has gotten stronger over the years. Also, I like the fact that 247 composite takes into consideration Rivals, ESPN and Scout Rankings to create their lists. This all being said my pecking order is....I think most folks go by Rivals - there's a pecking order, but Rivals always seems to be the one folks trust most.
ESPN sucks donkey dycks. Terrible. Shameful. The worst. They throw extra stars at big city kids, NYers, Cali boys, wherever. They get more clicks for pumping the players from those places and "avoiding SEC bias". They are all about selling advertising dollars. It is no different than their Game Day broadcast. Create controversy and clicks.ESPN has gotten stronger over the years. Also, I like the fact that 247 composite takes into consideration Rivals, ESPN and Scout Rankings to create their lists.