- Jun 11, 2014
- 7,068
- 6,419
Founding Member
I don't but then again..........I remember my first PCP hit.
I don't but then again..........I remember my first PCP hit.
You have to admire Deuce's determination though. No matter how many schiffy coaches he supports, he puffs just as hard for the NEXT schiffy coach.After having a few days to ponder this hire... I think RM will do a good job in Atlanta.
Douchebag Dan gave him the scouting report. Always sit Pitts as much as possible so he doesnt ruin your ideal base offense. If Pitts is on the field the QB will throw the ball to him and score points, instead of winning the rushing yards stats.Look, a dead body is an upgrade over Arthur Smith. Who drafts a TE and a RB in the first round and then puts them in a 50/50 timeshare with the lackluster backup at their position?
Kind of like SC hiring Muschamp.Morris is a complete joke. I'm glad our rival got him
Deuce loved that Dwag too.Kind of like SC hiring Muschamp.
I think this says more about the current Atlanta job than anything. There was really only one good opening this offseason and Harbaugh got it. Maybe Washington. I’m no BB fan, but there’s no way he pushed for that job, and if he did the demands would’ve been insane. Whoever they eventually landed was likely going to be a settle. Maybe a smart move by Blank to at least get credit for the diversity in the process.
With Blank I can understand. He's the classic meddling ignoramus owner. But McKay? He built the Tampa Bay Bucs team that won XXXVII from the ground up through the draft. He's well respected around the league.
I can hear his dad now. Execution? I'm all for it.
You know what Im NOT doing at age 71? Looking for a job.
I have no clue why Belichick would be.
Strange hire from a strange team in a strange town. Reeks of PC.
I'd rather have a QB and no weapons than a bunch of weapons with no QB. Weapons can be added, QB's can't.The LA job isn’t that great and quite frankly, not much different than the Falcons gig. It’s actually probably a worse job in the grand scheme of things at this time. The Chargers have a QB but they don’t have many offensive weapons around him. The Falcons don’t have a QB but they have some offensive weapons for a new QB to work with. Statistically, the Falcons were the better offense in 2023 despite fielding a tomato can at QB. The Chargers defense was much worse than Atlanta’s this past season. The Chargers are also in much worse shape with salary cap and what some of their veteran players will need to be re-signed.
The Falcons do have a huge handicap by having a dipshyt owner named Arthur Blank and a dipshyt former GM (still hanging around the building, though, similar to Foley) named Rich McKay. I don’t know much about Chargers ownership so I can’t speak to what they are like.
One thing I’m not liking that I keep hearing is how Pitts is overrated, under achieving and close to a bust based on where he was drafted.
I'd rather have a QB and no weapons than a bunch of weapons with no QB. Weapons can be added, QB's can't.
Saying that, the Chargers have plenty of talent. It was the best available job.
I'd rather have a QB and no weapons than a bunch of weapons with no QB. Weapons can be added, QB's can't.
Saying that, the Chargers have plenty of talent. It was the best available job.
This. If we’re seeing nothing else right now it’s that if you can get elite play from your QB you’ll go far in the playoffs. I can agree that the LA job probably had some downfalls as well, but it was the best job because you can build around Herbert.