rogdochar;n238866 said:Charges are : assault with a deadly weapon and issuance of terrorist threats.
t-gator;n238829 said:It should be zero. I think it's ridiculous that suh can stomp on players and damn near remove someone's starting qb with excessive shcit after a play but brady gets 4 for allegedly deflating footballs. Goodel needs to go.
WobbleGator;n238623 said:Only reason I believe it will be zero games is that Goodell and Kraft made a behind the scenes deal. Kraft accepts the penalties put on the Patriots if Brady's suspension is reduced to zero games.
TheDouglas78;n238992 said:Losing a #1 draft pick is a lot harder on an organization than losing your qb for 4 games.
MJMGator;n238996 said:I don't have a problem with the organization being penalized severely, as this is their second "cheating" scandal. My problem is with the decision to punish Brady without any evidence that he was involved in this.
TheDouglas78;n238999 said:The problem I have with it, is that the report that the League is using as evidence says that the coaching staff and management had no knowledge. So the evidence that is being used, shows no fault by the organization as a whole.
crosscreekcooter;n238939 said:Rog's wife had him arrested for assault with a dead weapon.
MJMGator;n239003 said:But employees of the organization were responsible, so it falls on the organization/management.
TheDouglas78;n239007 said:The employee's should be punished if they are going outside of the organizational guidelines and without the knowledge of the organization. By the definition you are giving, if Brady who handles balls on every play (similar to T) he should have known and reported. So by the same argument the organization/management should have known, it was Brady's responsibility to report it.
MJMGator;n239009 said:I disagree. Brady is not in management and isn't responsible for the actions of others. Kraft and the GM are. Assuming Brady should have known is just an opinion...not a fact. That's why I don't think it's just to punish him.
TheDouglas78;n239019 said:So players have no responsibility at all for the fairness and rules of the game? Is that the argument you are going with? Because if a high ranking member of the NFLPA isn't responsible for his own actions and to follow the guidelines of the rule book, who is? The evidence in my opinion doesn't warrant a 4 game suspension, we are just talking about deflating balls (circumstantial evidence at best but this isn't a court case either). But there is evidence of communications between the employees and Brady that was verified. The two employees should have been fired unless there is evidence they were specifically told to deflate them (similar to the Saints players winning appeal argument).
MJMGator;n239050 said:The players have responsibility for their own actions...not the actions of others within the organization. If you can't prove Brady participated in or orchestrated the deflating of the balls, then he shouldn't be punished. If they're just assuming he should have known, then why not suspend the center, RBs and WRs? They handled the balls, as well.
TheDouglas78;n239070 said:You could make a very valid argument for the refs who I do think should also be punished. Due to type of contact with the ball of the center, wide outs and running backs. They would not have the same exposure as Brady. Remember this isn't a court case, and the NFL doesn't need to prove he orchestrated it. They just have to prove by the CBA and previous upheld NFL punishments he didn't turn it in or try to stop it.
MJMGator;n239080 said:To me, this is a league failure to have control of the footballs and/or ensure they are up to league standards. It is not nor has it ever been the players responsibility to monitor this. What next, penalize the kicker if the goal posts are six inches too low? I think Goodell is overstepping his bounds and should just be happy Kraft took one for the team.