California, Florida sign law to allow college athletes to get paid

Status
Not open for further replies.

ThreatMatrix

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 28, 2014
16,541
26,096
Yeah, Saw a guy on Finebaum who said that this will take down college athletics as we know it. Thanx Kalifornia.
 

SeabeeGator

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jan 2, 2018
7,032
10,100

ThreatMatrix

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 28, 2014
16,541
26,096
He said other states (NY of course) were going to do the same thing. Even distribute the wealth from all public universities to pay all athletes.
 

soflagator

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Sep 4, 2014
21,274
79,421
It's funny. With every new change that was not only "absolutely necessary" but painted as something that would ultimately improve college football--targeting suspensions, transfer portal, new RS rule, etc--there have been unintended consequences that rear their ugly heads every season, even every week, leaving people amazed that this slippery slope is suddenly backfiring. And yet, we just keep doubling down.
 

Gator By Marriage

A convert to Gatorism
Lifetime Member
Dec 31, 2018
14,859
28,083
Perhaps some of the GCMB legal experts can weigh in, but I don't see how this changes anything until a bunch more states have done something similar. For one thing, while this bill allows for college athletes to be paid in Cali, are there any states with laws that prohibit it? From what I can tell, it is only the regulations that go along with membership in the NCAA that prohibit it. However, isn't the NCAA an organization that colleges have voluntarily joined? So unless enough states (and it would have to be the right states) do something similar, and thus push/force their respective state universities to leave the NCAA, or threaten it in order to force the NCAA to change, how can it be meaningful? Am I missing something?
 

5-Star Finger

Apex predator of the political forum biome
Lifetime Member
Nov 16, 2017
5,547
13,084
A lot of people will rush to defend this without understanding that literally the only value this product has is the tie to the institutions. That's why semi-pro leagues all fold eventually. Even if the quality of play declined people would still watch college football because of the tie to the college.

Let the ones that think they can command a wage start a semipro league and see how long that lasts. The free college, books, housing, food, training, publicity and a travel allowance (based on where the kid lives) are more than fair for what their labor is worth without the college branding - which is essentially nothing. The option to join one of those leagues has always existed for these young men. If it was a viable option, more of them would have done it.

And before anyone starting having a meltdown about coach compensation, I agree they are overpaid - but that's a market function. There are a lot fewer coaches that can do what is expected of them at this level then there are guys who can run with, throw or catch a football.
 

bradgator2

Founding Member
Rioting
Lifetime Member
Jun 12, 2014
9,546
25,169
Founding Member
"The Fair Pay to Play Act allows college athletes in California to sign endorsement deals; earn compensation based on the usage of their name, image and likeness; and sign all types of licensing contracts that would allow them to earn money."

Can you imagine if this spreads and the big dogs are allowed? The Bamas of the world will be able to openly promise the best recruits that they will earn millions in endorsements while in college.
 

ThreatMatrix

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 28, 2014
16,541
26,096
Players can go to the highest bidder. Not a good thing in any way, shape or form. The NCAA could try to exclude Cali but other states are likely to follow suit. And not just the gay states like NY. Think of any state with only one major football powerhouse.
 

ThreatMatrix

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Aug 28, 2014
16,541
26,096
The NCAA needs to get ahead of this and propose paying the athletes for the Power five conference teams.
Can of worms. If you pay football players you have to pay girls soccer to. Very few athletic departments operate in the black. Where does the money come from to distribute, Bernie?
 

soflagator

Senior Member
Lifetime Member
Sep 4, 2014
21,274
79,421
Can of worms. If you pay football players you have to pay girls soccer to. Very few athletic departments operate in the black. Where does the money come from to distribute, Bernie?

Also, is this pay in addition to the roughly 350k value they already receive? And if a 5* player turns out to be a bust, is he just cut like a professional player? How about a kid like Robinson or some of these kids who have major injuries in HS but colleges honor their commitment and scholarship? That has to go away at this point.

It’s incredible that we can simultaneously have a conversation about the extreme student loan debt problem in this country, and in the same breath insist that a full ride scholarship isn’t enough and athletes need compensation on top of that.
 

SeabeeGator

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jan 2, 2018
7,032
10,100
Can of worms. If you pay football players you have to pay girls soccer to. Very few athletic departments operate in the black. Where does the money come from to distribute, Bernie?
It doesn’t matter. It feels good to sign this. Someone else will figure out the details. Or college athletics will become insolvent. Either way - yay?!?
 

CU-UF

Meh
Lifetime Member
Aug 31, 2014
1,304
1,848
The should establish a trust fund that for all scholarship players on the Power 5 teams. Fund could only be accessible after a period of time and could only be used for educational expenses or other reasonable items. The inequality of what the institutions are extracting from the athletes is way out of balance. Placing funds in trusts should mitigate concerns of having to pay other programs
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.