Rex, I'm not trying to be a snot here, but you sure make a lot of assumptions. And the inflammatory deductions / insinuations / accusatory comments seem to have become your bread and butter. You threw out some stuff the other day about "what decent person" would let a player participate in a glorified scrimmage - just because he did not yet have the facts in hand. You did sort of walk that back by saying it was just a rhetorical question. But the implication was clear then, and even more so now in the light of your subsequent comments. I will agree that DM MAY well have "bungled" the situation with Steele, but then again MAYBE NOT. I tend to agree with the donkey and others that there were multiple factors involved in Steeles' departure and it really doesn't matter at this point, one way or the other. He's gone, take any appropriate lesson the situation has to offer and move the hell on. Steele is history, and just a minor footnote at that.