Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Theologator, Oct 5, 2018.
This is hysterical, enlightening and scary: Discuss.
Holy cow... I had heard about the dog 'rape culture' thing... That is good stuff in that video... hilarious.
There is corruption potentially in all studies, the issue is some can only get "peer review" while many in the hard sciences require experimental confirmation. Now this is a bad in some way comparison, but we are in the political forum. A female insists that a sexual abuse happened decades ago. Under peer review other females would see if there was anything in there that was clearly wrong. Under the opposite they would need objective evidence, or at least testimony that it was correct. Large difference, and many studies in the soft sciences have been proven to be questionable if not wrong.
Well said, Chief!
And they are finding many studies have unrepeatable results
"What appears to be beyond dispute is that making absurd and horrible ideas politically fashionable can get them validated at the highest level of academic grievance studies". What every conservative knows and every liberal refuses to admit.
You don't have the necessary permissions to use the chat.