Because it’s not an answer. —Do you think a woman should be able to abort a full term viable fetus that is 75% out of the birth canal? —I think that is a decision to be made between a woman and her doctor... A libertarian isn’t anti-law. I’m a lawyer, remember? Is a law prohibiting rape “more government regulation” I should oppose because I’m a libertarian? I believe in the mother’s rights, but I also believe in the child’s rights. Her rights stop where the child’s rights start. Where does the child’s right to life eclipse the mother’s right not to be inconvenienced? Where do you draw the line? No Democrat running for national office is willing to be honest about it so they all revert to the focus group tested line about a woman and her doctor making health care decisions. It’s a big fat lie. If her doctor says “nah” do Democrats really think that should be the last word? C’mon dude. Don’t be obtuse. They are only talking about doctors who believe in abortion on demand, often even children surviving outside the womb. Feel free to google “abortion survivors” and “Kermit Gosnell”. Then there’s this: Mass. AG Healey Joins Lawsuit Against Rule Allowing Clinicians To Refuse Abortions Of course it’s a meaningless platitude. If you can’t see that, then be honest about the blue state goggles you’re wearing. Alex.