- Aug 1, 2018
- 8,866
- 14,531
Lol...50-15
Watched the game today. Dink and dunk east west ball control up tempo offense. No thanks.
I saw better losses today than that. Vandy had a real good loss today. Maybe we should go after their coach too.
Again, no one says he should be target 1. But I think some here, not necessarily you, still fail to grasp the business scenario we find ourselves in. Unless Meyer pulls a 180, there is no risk free move here. Even Kiifin presents some unknowns. And while I’d put him as definite first choice, there is even less certainty behind him. What some, again not you per se, seem to miss is that there is major risk in anyone beyond that, just in different forms. We are either getting a big name and being tied up for 10 years with no guarantee of success, grabbing Klekman/Drinkwiz type and being tied up for 6-8, or hiring an up and comer with a lesser resume but higher trajectory and being tied up for 3-4. It’s either duration risk or experience risk.
For all the talk of how bad a guy like Golesh is—and let’s not forget that all of this was predicated on hard fought games against P4 teams and a 9-10 win season—I’ve yet to see a proposal of someone that would be definitively better.
Brohm > Golesh
Years ago...I’m not so sure, but I’d be ok with Brohm.
1906!!!! Welcome back
I think its very easy to see how dire the scenario is when Donkey and you are talking as if Golesh should even be considered as a possibility. Again, his resume is crappier than any of the previous 4 hires when they were hired. I mean really, isn't there some other mid level guy in a crappy conference doing better than Alex that we can fall back to first?Again, no one says he should be target 1. But I think some here, not necessarily you, still fail to grasp the business scenario we find ourselves in. Unless Meyer pulls a 180, there is no risk free move here. Even Kiifin presents some unknowns. And while I’d put him as definite first choice, there is even less certainty behind him. What some, again not you per se, seem to miss is that there is major risk in anyone beyond that, just in different forms. We are either getting a big name and being tied up for 10 years with no guarantee of success, grabbing Klekman/Drinkwiz type and being tied up for 6-8, or hiring an up and comer with a lesser resume but higher trajectory and being tied up for 3-4. It’s either duration risk or experience risk.
For all the talk of how bad a guy like Golesh is—and let’s not forget that all of this was predicated on hard fought games against P4 teams and a 9-10 win season—I’ve yet to see a proposal of someone that would be definitively better.
I think its very easy to see how dire the scenario is when Donkey and you are talking as if Golesh should even be considered as a possibility. Again, his resume is crappier than any of the previous 4 hires when they were hired. I mean really, isn't there some other mid level guy in a crappy conference doing better than Alex that we can fall back to first?
You havent had enough of trying to win 17-14 or 21-17 yet?I have no idea if Golesh is a big time coach or not but he has changed USF since he arrived for the good. For the 99.9% of UF football fans who only care about offense,
Was it Frost or Heupel? That said, given his total failure at his alma mater, he could probably be had cheap on an incentive based contract and terminated without penalty any December.If we were going to consider hiring this guy why not just go after the guy who masterminded the go fast offense in Scott Frost? That said....
I'm never for hiring someone who runs this system as it hangs a defense out to dry too often particularly when playing REAL teams.
Give me a guy who can run a conventional system well and use tempo maybe 2 or 3 plays at a time to take advantage of personnel or time issues and puts equal emphasis on both sides of the incentive based contract when recruiting and hiring staff.
Go fast stuff never wins championships
Kiffin would be Mark Richt, 9 or 10 wins/season. Urban is finished. Stick a fork in him, he's done.Again, no one says he should be target 1. But I think some here, not necessarily you, still fail to grasp the business scenario we find ourselves in. Unless Meyer pulls a 180, there is no risk free move here. Even Kiifin presents some unknowns. And while I’d put him as definite first choice, there is even less certainty behind him. What some, again not you per se, seem to miss is that there is major risk in anyone beyond that, just in different forms. We are either getting a big name and being tied up for 10 years with no guarantee of success, grabbing Klekman/Drinkwiz type and being tied up for 6-8, or hiring an up and comer with a lesser resume but higher trajectory and being tied up for 3-4. It’s either duration risk or experience risk.
For all the talk of how bad a guy like Golesh is—and let’s not forget that all of this was predicated on hard fought games against P4 teams and a 9-10 win season—I’ve yet to see a proposal of someone that would be definitively better.