- Jun 11, 2014
- 1,925
- 4,357
Founding Member
We've gotten pretty good at that.rogdochar;n35282 said:Are we gonna count the out-of-bounds completion yards ?
We've gotten pretty good at that.rogdochar;n35282 said:Are we gonna count the out-of-bounds completion yards ?
True, the biggest thing out of this game will be Muschump's offensive mindset toward cupcakes (we'll see his mindset toward better competition when we play Tenn)Fishon said:Anyone looking at the Idaho game as a sign of things to come for the entire season will be disappointed. I wouldn't take anything from this game, positive or negative. Having said that, I'm looking forward to the game and seeing our guys play hard
Remember our worst team in decades that lost to Ga Southern still handled Tennessee last year?Alvin York said:Well you do know the Vandals sacked Rome. Just make sure the mighty Vandals don't sack u and embarrass the entire SEC. Remember Georgia Southern?
heversle;n36148 said:I think about 220 yards. In his press conference, Muschamp mentioned that Idaho plays a lot of quarters coverage defensively. This tells me that despite the fact that they are obviously an inferior opponent, we shouldn't expect a ton of 50+ yard bombs from Driskel. To attack quarters, you generally have to throw short to intermediate passes (hitches, curls, etc) to your receivers and work the flats with your backs. While I can see them being susceptible to double moves or simply busting their coverage, I think they'll probably want to avoid getting beaten over the top in this game. Regardless, Driskel should still be able to pick their defense apart fairly easily, dinking and dunking to our receivers for the first quarter and a half of the game.
If you actually read what I wrote, the sarcasm really isn't warranted, sir. :/Captain Sasquatch said:heversle;n36148 said:I think about 220 yards. In his press conference, Muschamp mentioned that Idaho plays a lot of quarters coverage defensively. This tells me that despite the fact that they are obviously an inferior opponent, we shouldn't expect a ton of 50+ yard bombs from Driskel. To attack quarters, you generally have to throw short to intermediate passes (hitches, curls, etc) to your receivers and work the flats with your backs. While I can see them being susceptible to double moves or simply busting their coverage, I think they'll probably want to avoid getting beaten over the top in this game. Regardless, Driskel should still be able to pick their defense apart fairly easily, dinking and dunking to our receivers for the first quarter and a half of the game.
Yeahhhhhh if Idaho is playing quarters, there won't be any vertical passing attack. At all.
I was agreeing with you!Captain Sasquatch said:heversle;n36148 said:I think about 220 yards. In his press conference, Muschamp mentioned that Idaho plays a lot of quarters coverage defensively. This tells me that despite the fact that they are obviously an inferior opponent, we shouldn't expect a ton of 50+ yard bombs from Driskel. To attack quarters, you generally have to throw short to intermediate passes (hitches, curls, etc) to your receivers and work the flats with your backs. While I can see them being susceptible to double moves or simply busting their coverage, I think they'll probably want to avoid getting beaten over the top in this game. Regardless, Driskel should still be able to pick their defense apart fairly easily, dinking and dunking to our receivers for the first quarter and a half of the game.
Yeahhhhhh if Idaho is playing quarters, there won't be any vertical passing attack. At all.
Oh! Nevermind then. Lol.Captain Sasquatch said:heversle;n36148 said:I think about 220 yards. In his press conference, Muschamp mentioned that Idaho plays a lot of quarters coverage defensively. This tells me that despite the fact that they are obviously an inferior opponent, we shouldn't expect a ton of 50+ yard bombs from Driskel. To attack quarters, you generally have to throw short to intermediate passes (hitches, curls, etc) to your receivers and work the flats with your backs. While I can see them being susceptible to double moves or simply busting their coverage, I think they'll probably want to avoid getting beaten over the top in this game. Regardless, Driskel should still be able to pick their defense apart fairly easily, dinking and dunking to our receivers for the first quarter and a half of the game.
Yeahhhhhh if Idaho is playing quarters, there won't be any vertical passing attack. At all.
SaltGator;n34618 said:Better be 300 + . Idaho's defense is a joke, and there should be plenty of YAC.
Gator Fever;n36555 said:Idaho is talking like they are way better this year and think they have a chance against us.