Bjork also stated plainly that the next hire will have a heavily incentive based contract and that they aren't doing the break the bank thing again with a huge buyout. But hey, click bait is fun right?
Well, that's A&M's PREFERENCE. There's probably not a major university in the country that would disagree with that, philosophically.Bjork also stated plainly that the next hire will have a heavily incentive based contract and that they aren't doing the break the bank thing again with a huge buyout. But hey, click bait is fun right?
Really doubt recruits know something we do not. Napier not likely fired this season even if we lose tomorrow. But they see what we see, ineptness, lack of development, an unproven staff that mismanages games too often. Players don't want to be embarrassed, and "hurting in the locker room".
That's the problem, defense looks stupid. Once, twice a season, can recruit around. But defenses not playing basic football well is something they can see for themselves and don't need coaches telling them that UF is a risk. Another thing that comes to mind is, these kids talk to one another. No telling what some of our players are saying privately.
That would be incredible. We need this win. the win then salvaging some decommits and landing any of the above. .
Not necessarily talking about Napier there. Could be with the staff as well
If A&M has that kind of money to gamble again, wow. I would think the Fisher buyout would leave them short but I guess they have it? I would think they go a little lighter, if possible, but I don't know their financial position.
theathletic.com
Well, if it is rumored or intimated they would have better coaches at UF by the time they arrive, that should be seen as positive.
Not if uncertainty remains. Of course the negative recruiting would play it that way, most likely.
We all know how much a win tomorrow would help. Lord help us if staff appears to be less than 100%. Back of my mind, I could see us really showing up and playing well. Maybe with a little luck we get some TOs. Their QB has some huge ??? marks. On Brown, might be too much for him. OTOH, the way he played last week, I can envision at end of game we ask why he didn't see more PT. Really seemed like a versatile athlete.
I have a little different take. Telling defensive recruits that Sling Blade and Ham are on their way out is not negative recruiting. Telling recruits that Karl and Ham are still going to be there is the negative recruiting in that the D sux and will not be developed. At least if a recruit thinks Karl and Ham are on the way out, they might possibly say to themselves I will wait and see?
