- Jun 12, 2014
- 8,991
- 32,516
Founding Member
Despite the better play in the last couple of games, I couldn’t help but have a bit of a feeling that what was on display in Nashville yesterday could happen. It wound up being a day mostly that whatever could go wrong went wrong and what most thought unthinkable, a loss to Vanderbilt, perennial SEC cellar dwellers, played out before us. And just like that, poof, any goodwill that the team and Coach Napier had banked was gone.
If you didn’t watch the game and simply looked at the box score and compared total yards, you’d see UF with 445 and Vandy with 283. You might ask yourself “How in the heck did we lose?!” There wasn’t one factor. In fact there was a laundry list that when you look at them all, it was maybe surprising that we actually had an opportunity to win or tie at the end:
- Let’s start with Special Teams, that weren’t very special. A muffed punt return that was recovered by Vandy in the end zone for a TD was paramount among the gaffs. Our guy misjudged the trajectory and when the punt was sailing over his head he tried to reach back for the ball only to have it bounce off his finger tips into the end zone, where it was recovered by Vandy for the score. Add to that a missed PAT and a couple of short kickoffs that led to 62 combined return yards and great starting position and you have a failure in the third phase of the game.
- Defensive penalties, mostly untimely, were a huge factor. I believe we had been averaging six per game and while the eight we had might not seem significant just scanning the stat sheet, 3 or 4 times (I forget specifically) we turned third down stops into new life for the Commodores and they took advantage, either eventually going on to score or putting us in a field position disadvantage. Perhaps the biggest of these was the targeting call that put Ventrell Miller out for the remainder of the game (he had 11 total tackles at the time), but more importantly will keep him out of the F$U game for the first half on Friday. We shot ourselves in the foot penalty-wise and made Vandy’s path to victory that much easier.
- Vandy could run it, we couldn’t. Their 175 doesn’t sound dominating, but several were conversion runs that moved the chains. We couldn’t consistently stop them off-tackle and their back #2 rushed for 122. We were actually in a sound alignment with our LB/DE for most of the afternoon, but too often the LB (often Burney) tried to play inside out or took a shallow angle, giving up the edge. #2 also had a lot of yac, as he was tough to bring down on first contact. In the case of our inability to run the ball (45 total yards), maybe the biggest factor wasn’t necessarily our inability to block Vandy at the point of attack (which was significant), but the fact AR ran only 4 times for 25 yards (more on this later). All told, what has been our bread and butter was no factor and as we were witness, we can’t win without it.
- We gave up 3 scores through the air and 2 of those were to TEs. Just seems like we have a hard time covering what are the biggest and least speedy receivers on the opposing rosters. From a yardage standpoint, their guy didn’t exactly carve us up (10/16 for 108 yards), but he made it count when they were in the red zone.
- AR continues to perplex. While 25/42 for 400 yards with 3 TDs was significant, I believe his most important stat was the aforementioned 4 rushes for 25 yards. Without a play sheet I can’t know for sure, but it appeared that he was reluctant to pull and run it on the inside option (that mostly netted 20 rushing yards by our backs). Maybe Billy told him to give and not pull? I have a hard time believing that as the backside DE had crashed frequently. And we started the second half with a couple of of relatively successful AR runs, but quickly went back to the same old same old that Vandy was stopping. Despite a big yardage day passing, without his legs being a big part of the offense, AR is more average overall and seems to have several glaring misses each game or makes mistakes at critical times. To wit, the last possession wound up being a crap fest with his second to last pass being a low ball that kept our receiver in bounds and causing our last play (which was a gift) to result in a throw 20 rows up into the end zone instead of a jump ball that would at least give us a shot to tie/win. The guy is a phenomenal athlete and can play with a lead and everything rolling smoothly, but he can’t seem to play under pressure consistently and all too often, as my Nole brother in law commented yesterday, seems to frequently be disinterested. All told, if he is unwilling to use his legs, we might just as well give Kitna a shot.
- We didn’t seem particularly well-prepared mentally and couldn’t get the switch turned on when it was clear that Vandy was playing like they expected to win. This is on Billy. Listening to the postgame, Billy acknowledged as much, took responsibility, but didn’t really get into the specifics. Regardless, that can’t happen. I’ll further add that it is more than clear to me now that Billy needs an OC/QB coach. You guys that have pointed that out previously can give yourselves a pat on the back! He might possibly have been able to pull the multiple roles off if he wasn’t having to play both coach and counselor to his QB/man child, but that point is now beyond moot. His strengths are programmatic organization and recruiting, though with the fickle nature of high school kids intensified by the whole NIL influence, he may well be pressed in that area. Understand when I tell you that I’m not advocating for a change as the only consistent we’ve had coaching-wise since Meyer’s last season is inconsistency and coaches heading into the bunker before they were fired and/or ran off. It may not be optimal in the eyes of some, but Billy’s got to have at least two years to get things turned, the speed of which makes even the most ardent and patient of fans raise a little hell.
Go Gators!
Last edited: