Oscar the G
Well-Known Member
- Nov 7, 2018
- 574
- 178
Recruiting was pretty even I think.Because we (Chump) had out recruited Georgia, i.e. we had more talent. Even SharkFcker couldn't screw that up.
Recruiting was pretty even I think.Because we (Chump) had out recruited Georgia, i.e. we had more talent. Even SharkFcker couldn't screw that up.
Not a huge discrepancy like it is now.Recruiting was pretty even I think.
mcelwain got us to Atlanta, but that shouldn't change your expectations.
So we just have to move in that direction? I get that recruiting is important, but he should only be "evaluated" for wins and losses.McElwain did not get UF competitive in Atlanta and that is the issue. I think we have a good metric proposed in this thread to evaluate Mullen.
If UF is:
1. moving toward 82 to 85 recruited scholarship players
2. moving toward having 50 or 51 blue chip players.
3. moving towards having 5 or so five star players.
If UF is moving in that direction, then Mullen may be building up the roster towards what we need and UF may be competitive the next time in Atlanta.
I think we have a good metric
You could argue that recruiting has gotten slightly worse. The coaching is light years better though and the s&c( like you said) aswell. But recruiting could be a touch worse.
The only one that will hurt this year is Steele. Black will hurt next year, when Reese leaves.
Recruiting impacts are felt 2-3 years down the road the most. We’re going to have to use the transfer market to make up for the shortfalls in this class.The only one that will hurt this year is Steele. Black will hurt next year, when Reese leaves.
mcelwain got us to Atlanta, but that shouldn't change your expectations.
Because of the lack of a full roster, we need to take in a few transfers this off-season to go along with a full class. Playing w/ less than 80 scholarship players is like putting yourself on probation.
You missed the context.And Georgia had Richt, and a first year Kirby... what happened after that?
You missed the context.