- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,703
- 111,543
Founding Member
biiiitchIts very disappointing that there are really none. She's got her stuff locked down, which really makes her even hotter.
biiiitchIts very disappointing that there are really none. She's got her stuff locked down, which really makes her even hotter.
Its very disappointing that there are really none. She's got her stuff locked down, which really makes her even hotter.
Again...I do like an expansion...12 is crazy.
I hate the meaningless bowls.
And why do we have 129? Div-1 Teams.
I'd like to pair that down to 84-96 and 6 Conferences with 2 Divisions Each.
Have 6 Championships...winners have a bye.
Have 4 Wild-Card. Winners play Top Ranked conference champs.
8 Team Play-off.
Eliminate non-Power Conference In Season Games.
Cut the Season to 10 Games
I think 8 is the most you can go without destroying the regular season, and I still wonder if 8 is too much.I’d prefer an 8 team playoff. But I’m okay with 12.
Anything over 12 is ridiculous. Then regular season needs to carry weight. And there no way a a 16 seed team is going to win the MNC.
But a 12 seed might. And it may give them the exposure needed to get elite recruits.
Pretending #12 ranked 3 loss team should be contending for a "championship" IS Participation Trophy land.it borders on ...
s
Honestly, I like them too. But oretending the next Central Fla, Coastal Carolina, or Houston is a natuonal titke contender is insane. Or even in the same plane as SEC teams.
They should never be in same division. Let Memphis play Coastal for the 1AAa crown.
I think 8 is the most you can go without destroying the regular season, and I still wonder if 8 is too much.
I think 8 is the most you can go without destroying the regular season, and I still wonder if 8 is too much.
I am in favor of a 128 team playoff format. Errrbody gets in. Maybe even double elimination. After week one, you have 64 in the winners bracket and 64 in the losers bracket. After week two, 32 in the winners bracket and 64 in the losers bracket. After week three, 16 in the winners bracket and 48 in the losers. After week four, 8 in the winners, 28 in the losers. Week five, 4 in the winners, 18 in the losers. Etc. Everyone eliminated can schedule the rest of the season amongst the two time losers.I’d prefer an 8 team playoff. But I’m okay with 12.
Anything over 12 is ridiculous. Then regular season needs to carry weight. And there no way a a 16 seed team is going to win the MNC.
But a 12 seed might. And it may give them the exposure needed to get elite recruits.
I am in favor of a 128 team playoff format. Errrbody gets in. Maybe even double elimination. After week one, you have 64 in the winners bracket and 64 in the losers bracket. After week two, 32 in the winners bracket and 64 in the losers bracket. After week three, 16 in the winners bracket and 48 in the losers. After week four, 8 in the winners, 28 in the losers. Week five, 4 in the winners, 18 in the losers. Etc. Everyone eliminated can schedule the rest of the season amongst the two time losers.
When you are retired, you have to think of things to think about so you keep thinking your thoughts are meaningful.Jeeze, you put some thought into that.
When you are retired, you have to think of things to think about so you keep thinking your thoughts are meaningful.
Gotta believe the committee will go with top ranked remaining teams, factoring in W-L, head2head matchups and sos, and hope they eventually have a bias against notre lame.5 would be Power 5 champs...how do you pick the other 3? And is it fair if they don't play in a Championship?
It is the way I roll.... or stumble....I would've posted more in this thread, but that drunk talking donkey kept stealing my posts and pawning them off as his. 12 is absurd. I'm not watching those seeds get their teeth kicked in every year.
Gotta believe the committee will go with top ranked remaining teams, factoring in W-L, head2head matchups and sos, and hope they eventually have a bias against notre lame.