I was only referring to the game itself here, BTW. The halftime show is a different matter.Watching it and believing what you see is legit will do that, too. It's not diabolical.
Because…KANSAS!!!!
Now, go analyze the two times KC went for it on 4th down vs. the Ravens... the exact situations in that game, and get back to me on why you aren't calling Andy Reid an idiot. I'll save you the time... because they won.
Winning matters.Now, go analyze the two times KC went for it on 4th down vs. the Ravens... the exact situations in that game, and get back to me on why you aren't calling Andy Reid an idiot. I'll save you the time... because they won.
Now, go analyze the two times KC went for it on 4th down vs. the Ravens... the exact situations in that game, and get back to me on why you aren't calling Andy Reid an idiot. I'll save you the time... because they won.
I'm not saying Reid is an idiot. I am saying there are reasons why he did go for it... twice, with a lead...Andy Reid is an idiot.... because Deet says so.... I mean if we are going to go there, does that mean Napier is a genius because he likes going for on 4th down in dumb ass situations?
It’s situational. You know it and are just being stubborn about this whole situation. Dan kicked a FG the first 4th down he had. He also punted twice on 4th down. 4th & 6 and 4th & 9.Now, go analyze the two times KC went for it on 4th down vs. the Ravens... the exact situations in that game, and get back to me on why you aren't calling Andy Reid an idiot. I'll save you the time... because they won.
You’re right. He had the lead. And he’s been there before. More than once. He knows when to take the risk and when to take the points. He’s also made mistakes in his past that he has learned from.I'm not saying Reid is an idiot. I am saying there are reasons why he did go for it... twice, with a lead...
I'm not saying Reid is an idiot. I am saying there are reasons why he did go for it... twice, with a lead...
We're talking about 4th and "less than three"... not 4th and whatever. Yes, he took the 21 yard FG attempt at the half, he passed on the 43 and 48 yard attempts.It’s situational. You know it and are just being stubborn about this whole situation. Dan kicked a FG the first 4th down he had. He also punted twice on 4th down. 4th & 6 and 4th & 9.
The situation of his wrong decision was going for it on 4th down after he chocked a 17 point lead and gave up 20 unanswered points and now trailing. SF was clearly crushing them and he need points to slow down momentum and stay in the game. Anyone who know anything about football other than you will agree it was the wrong decision.
Or, Reid went with analytics, and they executed on the one attempt.You’re right. He had the lead. And he’s been there before. More than once. He knows when to take the risk and when to take the points. He’s also made mistakes in his past that he has learned from.
Dan just made a mistake and will learn from it. He will lose sleep at night praying he even gets in that position again, ever.
I'll say it until I'm blue in the face... the two 4th downs are NOT what lost them the game.I had no issue with him going for it just like I didn't have an issue with Reid going for it. Its about context of the situation. The only issue I have was the running play under two minutes to go at the goal line, still needing a second score. Time and timeouts are too important in that situation.
What was the reason?the two 4th downs are NOT what lost them the game.
He already gave his opinion on that. I know you're trying to egg him on, but you have to be more creative.What was the reason?