Ancient Reptile
Senior Member
- Mar 4, 2015
- 10,796
- 11,119
Perfectly acceptable for law to adopt a legalistic approach. What strikes the impartial observer is that it was 95% a form tackle and the tackler can't be responsible for the receiver aiming at the tackler's helmet with his own, missing and hitting the tackler's shoulder. And belay the "go low" stuff, if a QB and he takes a step back you get ejected for trying to injure his legs.