- Jul 29, 2014
- 22,277
- 23,608
You'd get to give out the "Nutritional Athlete of Month" award then.Please someone tell me how to apply for that Nutritional position....there's more than a few who would be like
I agree. He strikes me as very genuine. He’s just in over his head.I know my opinion doesn't mean much, but totally disagree with everyone saying Napier doesn't care about the outcome and is just counting the days to get fired so he can get paid the buyout.
I believe Napier wants to win here and he believes that what worked at ULL will work here, given enough time. I think that is where his thinking fails him, but he is not pulling a Mullen IMO.
I think Dez had first dibs.Please someone tell me how to apply for that Nutritional position....there's more than a few who would be like
Into the great wide open!Next season the third quarter song should be changed to "Free Fallin'".
I mean obviously Deboer has all the advantages at Washington over Billy here…….
A weak, crumbling conference? Yes...yes he does
I mean obviously Deboer has all the advantages at Washington over Billy here…….
Funny you say that ChokesOnDickJay26.SEC has been down bigly last few seasons.
Funny you say that ChokesOnDickJay26.
The SEC currently has 5 of the top 13 teams in the nation.
7 of the top 13 if you count new teams coming in next season in Texas and Oklahoma.
Let's take a look at the Pac 12 (4?.....2?) They have 2 in the top 13.
You were saying?
yes, digging from 20+ is great for your argumentIf you can find where I said PAC 12 was better, I’d agree. And funny you stop at top 13 and cherry pick. SEC has 6 top 25, PAC 12 has 4. Let’s not try and act like there’s some huge disparity.
And do we really believe Mizzou is a top 13 team? A team we had on the ropes And Tennessee a top 25 team? You’re out your mind.
Stop making excuses for Billy boy.
Your reading comprehension of your own words are about as good as your ability to not ride the fenceI’m sure Billy would be 26-0 at Washington if you ask Urg
yes, digging from 20+ is great for your argument
You said the SEC was down. I just showed you we have 5 teams in the top 13. I stuck with 13 because of that fact. Sorry you missed it in your undying love for a dying conference.
Is Mizzou currently ranked in the top 13? Yes, yes they are, so yes, they are a top 13 team. Math hard for you bro?
We are down. God awful terrible team. But that doesn't mean the conference sucks. And it's about to get stronger.
Did I claim the ACC was a strong conference?I see you can’t use logic or your own eyes. You think FSU is truly a top 4 team? Go on Nole lover, answer the question.
Did I claim the ACC was a strong conference?
Keep digging
No, you claimed rankings are end all be all sir. I’m pointing out thank rankings are flawed.
Answer the question.