UF to play Cal in 2026/27

BMF

Bad Mother....
Lifetime Member
Sep 8, 2014
25,446
59,428

I don't get it. I'd rather play a regional game vs. Va Tech, Ga Tech, NC State...or even a Maryland or Texas Tech type team. I doubt we'd ever seen a powerhouse home and home (like Texas, Michigan, Clemson, Ohio State, etc) - those games tend to be a one game/neutral site thing.

Anyhow, I guess it's better than bringing in another 1AA team - but we lose a home game.
 

gatormandan

Are we back yet?
Lifetime Member
Oct 15, 2014
12,185
16,975
It sure doesn't excite me any...but then again I am living year to year nowadays and don't look that far ahead. I have to agree that someone you mentioned would have been more attractive.
 

GatorJ

Founding Member
Hopeful
Moderator
Jun 11, 2014
21,136
33,952
Founding Member
I don't get it. I'd rather play a regional game vs. Va Tech, Ga Tech, NC State...or even a Maryland or Texas Tech type team. I doubt we'd ever seen a powerhouse home and home (like Texas, Michigan, Clemson, Ohio State, etc) - those games tend to be a one game/neutral site thing.

Anyhow, I guess it's better than bringing in another 1AA team - but we lose a home game.

That’s a lot of crappy ACC teams.
 

Captain Sasquatch

Founding Member
Mr. SQ, the Sashole
BANNED
Jun 10, 2014
16,578
20,016
Founding Member
I don't get it. I'd rather play a regional game vs. Va Tech, Ga Tech, NC State...or even a Maryland or Texas Tech type team. I doubt we'd ever seen a powerhouse home and home (like Texas, Michigan, Clemson, Ohio State, etc) - those games tend to be a one game/neutral site thing.

Anyhow, I guess it's better than bringing in another 1AA team - but we lose a home game.
We're doing a home and home with Texas in '30 and '31.
 

BMF

Bad Mother....
Lifetime Member
Sep 8, 2014
25,446
59,428
We're doing a home and home with Texas in '30 and '31.

True, but that's more of an outlier.

I know that's a lot of "crappy ACC teams", but they're also more in our recruiting territory. I see no benefits giving up a home game to play Cal (or Arizona State, Utah, Colorado, etc).
 

GatorJ

Founding Member
Hopeful
Moderator
Jun 11, 2014
21,136
33,952
Founding Member
True, but that's more of an outlier.

I know that's a lot of "crappy ACC teams", but they're also more in our recruiting territory. I see no benefits giving up a home game to play Cal (or Arizona State, Utah, Colorado, etc).

We should play Clemson, Penn State, OSU, Notre Dame, Texas, OU.

The majority of our games are in Florida which should be 90% of our recruiting territory.
 

BMF

Bad Mother....
Lifetime Member
Sep 8, 2014
25,446
59,428
We should play Clemson, Penn State, OSU, Notre Dame, Texas, OU.

The majority of our games are in Florida which should be 90% of our recruiting territory.

Key word in your sentence, "should". These AD's don't want to do it unless it's a kickoff game/neutral site game.

So...if we're going to do this - and we are, there's already at least 4 or 5 of them scheduled - we should do it against teams in our region. That's just my opinion. I'm sure there's people who would rather play Purdue or Illinois than Utah or Colorado. But if we played against NC State in Raleigh there are a ton of recruits there....if we played Ga Tech in Atlanta, again - tons of recruits. Va Tech is essentially the entire state of Virginia and we recruit the state and DMV area regularly. I just don't see the benefit of going to Berkeley or Boulder.
 

78

Founding Member
Dazed and Confused
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
19,752
27,649
Founding Member
When’s the last time a Pac-12 visited UF? My guess would be USC in ‘82, the Wilber game.
 

Swamp Donkey

Founding Member
7-14 vs P5 Fire Stricklin First
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
78,480
110,920
Founding Member
True, but that's more of an outlier.

I know that's a lot of "crappy ACC teams", but they're also more in our recruiting territory. I see no benefits giving up a home game to play Cal (or Arizona State, Utah, Colorado, etc).
We have English and we OWN California.
 

GatorJ

Founding Member
Hopeful
Moderator
Jun 11, 2014
21,136
33,952
Founding Member
Key word in your sentence, "should". These AD's don't want to do it unless it's a kickoff game/neutral site game.

So...if we're going to do this - and we are, there's already at least 4 or 5 of them scheduled - we should do it against teams in our region. That's just my opinion. I'm sure there's people who would rather play Purdue or Illinois than Utah or Colorado. But if we played against NC State in Raleigh there are a ton of recruits there....if we played Ga Tech in Atlanta, again - tons of recruits. Va Tech is essentially the entire state of Virginia and we recruit the state and DMV area regularly. I just don't see the benefit of going to Berkeley or Boulder.

Value could be a great experience for the players. No value in recruiting. But I think it’s a great opportunity for the student athletes. And for expansion of the brand.
 

YLGator

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Jan 14, 2016
1,430
3,719
We should play Clemson, Penn State, OSU, Notre Dame, Texas, OU.

The majority of our games are in Florida which should be 90% of our recruiting territory.
We definitely should be playing these teams on a regular basis......in the playoffs. Regular season schedule should still include the likes of Eastern Washington, South Alabama, New Mex St. and FSU. That's plenty good enough to get us to the playoffs as SEC champions.
 

Pablos Tunnel

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Sep 23, 2017
2,689
4,130
It sure doesn't excite me any...but then again I am living year to year nowadays and don't look that far ahead. I have to agree that someone you mentioned would have been more attractive.
Dude you are younger than most on this board
 

78

Founding Member
Dazed and Confused
Lifetime Member
Jun 9, 2014
19,752
27,649
Founding Member
He’s fighting cancer. Bless you, gatormandan. I’m pulling for you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.