I concur except for Bama. They're doing it for a massive payday, not for competition.Captain Sasquatch;n271828 said:I'm gonna give some of these top teams credit. OSU, TCU, MSU, and Baylor all going on the road in week 1, and Bama playing a neutral site in a big game against a top 25 team.
MJMGator;n271837 said:I concur except for Bama. They're doing it for a massive payday, not for competition.
Wake Forest > SMUCaptain Sasquatch;n271838 said:This is true, but they could be getting the payday against, say, Wake Forest.
Captain Sasquatch;n271838 said:This is true, but they could be getting the payday against, say, Wake Forest.
MJMGator;n271837 said:I concur except for Bama. They're doing it for a massive payday, not for competition.
Demarcus Robinsonrogdochar;n271844 said:One thing I've noticed in just watching a bit of 4 games so far = there are a lot of really long-legged WRs. I mean
athletic guys with really skinny long legs. Do we have any of those type WRs ?
gardnerwebbgator;n271850 said:Baylor playing a road game at a much weaker SMU and Michigan State playing an in-state lower rung MAC team shoots holes in Foley's lame assed excuses to not sign a quality home/home series out of conference instead of the FBS cupcake every year.
Captain Sasquatch;n271852 said:We do have a quality non conference home/home series. It's called the FSU rivalry.
soflagator;n271859 said:This. A full SEC slate, plus fsu is more than enough for any team. I'd like to see us host more MAC type teams in lieu of the FCS teams, but that's about it. I think I counted 6 of our opponents in the Preseason Top 25. Not to mention the financial benefits of those 2-3 cupcakes each year. Yeah, I'm good.
Captain Sasquatch;n271862 said:Thankfully we aren't playing an FCS team this year, even though NMSU and FAU are awful. However, ECU is a solid mid-major level team and of course FSU. Nothing wrong with our schedule this year.
soflagator;n271870 said:Now if we can just get fans to show up for the games. And it doesn't even have to be complete families. If husbands--while perhaps not able to attend themselves--would just let their wives go, we just may fill the stadium. Instead, too often, neither show, and then the husband uses various internet-based platforms to portray his reasons for the collective no-show as noble, even romantic, while undoubtedly future sexual favors are his real ambition for such blatant embellishment. It's disgusting.
soflagator;n271870 said:Now if we can just get fans to show up for the games. And it doesn't even have to be complete families. If husbands--while perhaps not able to attend themselves--would just let their wives go, we just may fill the stadium. Instead, too often, neither show, and then the husband uses various internet-based platforms to portray his reasons for the collective no-show as noble, even romantic, while undoubtedly future sexual favors are his real ambition for such blatant embellishment. It's disgusting.