- Oct 15, 2014
- 12,185
- 16,975
Playing Emory would open up the run game and the middle of the field tremendously because he is actually a threat to run. Running a spread option style offense without a QB who even tries to run let's teams just key on the RB and the read option is turned into a 0 yd gain over and over like it was last night...playing Emory would jump start our offense imoI wonder what is better...we stick with Franks and win 9 games (maybe) or we throw EJ out there and win 7 games (or possibly more). I don't think we should wait. Lets see what he can do. We already know what Franks can(t) do.
His play is one thing, but what's with the way he acts?
I wonder what is better...we stick with Franks and win 9 games (maybe) or we throw EJ out there and win 7 games (or possibly more). I don't think we should wait. Lets see what he can do. We already know what Franks can(t) do.
That's one way to get the tight end involved in the offense.Can Franks catch? Could promote him to TE.
He is a child with a big armHis play is one thing, but what's with the way he acts?
Great question. There will be a couple games that FF gives away with his dumb ass decisions.I wonder what is better...we stick with Franks and win 9 games (maybe) or we throw EJ out there and win 7 games (or possibly more). I don't think we should wait. Lets see what he can do. We already know what Franks can(t) do.