- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,481
- 110,929
Founding Member
You just checked scores? I'm just looking at the offense, specifically what his "no running QB" offense looked like in 2012, which is different than 2006 UF.That was fun
They beat Barn, Tinerc, Kintuck and Pigberts, but I just can't find the link to any of those on youtube, other than highlights.In 2012 they had a decent record but did really bad on offense against the good SEC teams.
You aren't particularly bright, are you?So what you are saying is that our offense will look EXACTLY like that with the SAME EXACT players?? I am guessing that most of those players are gone or haven't transferred to UF.
I posted them for x and o purposes. The recent stuff (also when Mullinz was being ordered what to do by Creyer) is more relevent.No videos of when Mullen was OC at UF?? Let's see those play calls. I am guessing not cause all the credit goes to Urbs
Here is the actual post by Fever, Boss. It was in the roster number thread and people opining what no FB on the roster might mean:You said nothing about play selection in the thread until after my comment.
In 2012 Mullen ran an offense with a QB who couldn't run. Didn't use a fullback hardly at all either. So that doesn't mean a lot I would think. All he did until very late 2012 was let Prescott run a few plays here and there at QB I think.
Anywho, what is the consensus on the Mullen offense? Are we gonna be top 50? Top 100 again? Will Mullen's offense be an upgrade? Do we have the Jimmy's and Joe's? Are we able to predict it yet or do we have to wait until September to actually see them play?
With Franks I definitely don't see a top 50 situation at years end. I have a feeling this will be like 2014 where most people got excited we crushed that joke first opponent and then the offense/Driskel looked like straight crap the next game against KY forcing us into triple OT or whatever it was.
The contenders:And yet that 2014 offense has been our best offense this decade.
And yet that 2014 offense has been our best offense this decade.