- Sep 15, 2014
- 10,305
- 14,066
I thought SC was paying him as a consultant, or adviser or something like that? So he's advising two SEC East opponents? Sounds kinda weird to me, and certainly sounds like a conflict of interest too.
I hope you're right.Based on his comments, I'd say he's moved on from that gig. After all, it's a big step up.
I thought SC was paying him as a consultant, or adviser or something like that? So he's advising two SEC East opponents? Sounds kinda weird to me, and certainly sounds like a conflict of interest too.
I thought SC was paying him as a consultant, or adviser or something like that? So he's advising two SEC East opponents? Sounds kinda weird to me, and certainly sounds like a conflict of interest too.
I hope you're right.
Let's be honest, this is about Kyle Trask. Greatness recognizes greatness.
I did. I don't see any discussion about him quitting his USC consultant job to accept this new job. The way things are these days, you can't assume anything...Damn, Nav....read the press release in post #1.....
I did. I don't see any discussion about him quitting his USC consultant job to accept this new job. The way things are these days, you can't assume anything...
I need it to be spelled out. I'm not as smart as some of you other guys.I will now pull for South Carolina to win every game but one, just as I did when I pulled for Florida to win every game but one as the Gamecock coach.
(How much clearer do you need it to be?)