It's obvious to me that winning in College Football requires an efficient dynamic offense.
Talent? Maybe at some point but, I see Ol Miss, Miss State, Tennessee and others across the country, with obvious talent deficiencies, scoring points, and winning.
Yeah, you need top tier talent to beat the big boys. We don't have that.
The only "Big boy" we've played so far was Georgia and we were embarrassed.
Apparently though, You don't need top tier, "25 5 star" talent, to go 10-2.
You just need a great offense.
Point is, With our current staff and our current players there is no reason whatsoever we should have lost to Kentucky and maybe LSU and Tennessee.
It's coaching.
I went to Ox's re-education camp.
I was not totally against the Napier hire, not totally enamored either, and I warmed quickly to the staff and the new hires and building the program, the analysts, and upgrading the facilities etc....I also think he's re building our relationships with the High Schools across the country and especially in Florida.
To me, this whole thing is eerily similar to Muschamp., except, with no defense.
"Napier needs an offensive coordinator!"
My God, Muschamp heard that so much he hired Charlie Weiss and Roper.
“I probably made a mistake at Florida trying to change schematically from what they had done before,” Muschamp actually told Gridiron Now (for real, no joking this time). “As a result, we ended up not being very good at anything. These days you just don’t have time to make a lot of changes. You have to adapt to what your kids can do.”
Muschamp's correct when he says Florida wasn't good at anything on offense. In his four seasons with the Gators, Muschamp's offenses managed to score 25.3 points per game. It was even worse in SEC-play, as the Gators could muster only 22.8 points per game.
Florida never managed to finish in even the top half of the SEC in points per game under Muschamp.
Napier needs to make sure year two, doesn't even resemble this year or we are right back where we were 10 years ago.
Very troubling.