I think the problem is that we just still don’t have talented depth who can actually replace those that keep making the same mistakes.Despite, I’d really like to know what the numbers are telling Billy, or at least his extrapolation. And not just offensively. Time was, position coaches graded each snap for members of their position group (e.g. + or -) and assigned a grade which became the basis for practice reps/reinforcement or a repositioning of the depth chart, new starters, reduced or increased snaps, etc. Just going on eyeballs, it looks like we make a ton of mistakes (position, technique, and effort), but some of the primary offenders keep getting the snaps and repeat the problems. With game 9 upcoming, it just seems like it is past time to have made corrections, coached up other players on the depth chart, with more efficient play and outcomes being the goal, but so far it’s same same.
It's baffling.Despite, I’d really like to know what the numbers are telling Billy, or at least his extrapolation. And not just offensively. Time was, position coaches graded each snap for members of their position group (e.g. + or -) and assigned a grade which became the basis for practice reps/reinforcement or a repositioning of the depth chart, new starters, reduced or increased snaps, etc. Just going on eyeballs, it looks like we make a ton of mistakes (position, technique, and effort), but some of the primary offenders keep getting the snaps and repeat the problems. With game 9 upcoming, it just seems like it is past time to have made corrections, coached up other players on the depth chart, with more efficient play and outcomes being the goal, but so far it’s same same.
I don’t doubt that depth is a factor given what went on in terms of ongoing roster development with the previous staff and agree that it takes time, but if I just limit my criticism to #’s 3, 8, and 10 defensively and #76 offensively, given the inordinate number of negative plays/loafs that are put forth and them not showing any appreciable improvement through 8 games, it just seems a coach would say that it’s time to give some others a chance in the games as the outcome’s likely not going to be any worse. I do know that if you continue to reward poor effort, there’s not going to be any positive change. Why should there be?I think the problem is that we just still don’t have talented depth who can actually replace those that keep making the same mistakes.
I think we’re close. But probably still a year away.
I think I read somewhere that it took Kirby six years until he beat Bama. And that’s with solid recruiting classes already established under Richt.
I think the majority of it is youth. Though I think a new system is the reason for defense. It’s not completely new. But it has a lot of different schemes than last year. And the defense is probably the youngest D in the country.It's baffling.
I've never seen as many variable inconsistencies across almost all units withing the team.
Not at this point in the season.
I'm a process guy ... operations, engineering, quality, strat planning, facilities etc.
Just what I see on gameday, It doesn't look like there's any process controls in place.
Looking forward to seeing changes in the off season.
That’s Bama. We are on a six year plan to beat Kentucky.I think I read somewhere that it took Kirby six years until he beat Bama. And that’s with solid recruiting classes already established under Richt.
Absolutely. C'mon bro, there is NO WAY you can win 8-9 games unless you have the top recruiting class in the nation with 5-stars everywhere.Mizzo is 7-1 and about 2 plays away from 8-0. They must have WAY more talent than we do.
Might be time to revoke GatorJ's thread starting abilities.
Dominion Voting issue?The truth is, he doesn’t report to a commissioner. He reports to a committee. Some appointed, some elected, some co-opted on a biannual basis. It’s a quorum.