- Jun 9, 2014
- 78,733
- 111,608
Founding Member
Threat...you may be on to something ;)
LOL, yeah, whatever.
Threat...you may be on to something ;)
If he's here for FNL...it's a done deal. Book it.
Give me poo.
If he's here for FNL...it's a done deal. Book it.
Give me poo.
Feeks like that is sigworthy.If he's here for FNL...it's a done deal. Book it.
Give me poo.
The only thing I can think of is that he is not 100%. He wants to take OV's to make sure. If he's silent, he may be 95% and just needs confirmation. That doesn't mean he hasn't told commits that he's leaning UF. We are hearing that we may end up with 4 commits this week, Dunlap and 3 more.I can't come up with a reason where the cons don't outweigh the pros on having Fields be a silent commit.
I have a difficult time buying that.
If he's here for FNL...it's a done deal. Book it.
Give me poo.
That would be a very, very good sign in our favor!Stampini is saying (according to his sources) Fields will be at FNL.
I've already posted his offensive stats it's not My problem if you refuse to see the facts. you're acting like a pumper wrt to Mac winning the East. I've made the case why he's a great coach. You've posted one argument to refute it. One that doesn't hold up when put next to every other metric a HC is judged by
Allow me to express it in terms Swonky et al can embrace: "Fields don't want nobody to know 'cause he's so so ashamed that he's going with McNuss."I can't come up with a reason where the cons don't outweigh the pros on having Fields be a silent commit.
I have a difficult time buying that.
The wife's grounded you again, eh Durty.Just want everyone to know that I will be at my house this weekend
Then I'll bring my bagpipes and we can all just pretend it's the score from the musical Swonky wrote = "Les McNuss Miserables"I'm bringing my accordion.
Well, I'll just poo-poo all your prior posts.If he's here for FNL...it's a done deal. Book it.
Give me poo.
Keep cherry picking. You'll have enough to start a pie in a few hours at this rate. I've made my case. You have not. It is the HCs job to recruit and win. Jimbo has done both. You failing to see that is not my problem. The Mac comparison was you using one set of data that cpnpletely ignores every other metric to judge a HC.I'm a pumper? If that is your response, being that McElwain has nothing to do with the case for or against Jimbo says all you need to know. Why is he a great coach? Top 5 talent every year, and other than the two years without the best one of the most athletically gifted quarterbacks in the last decade he is 9-9 against the top 25. Only has had top 50 offenses (YPG) in 4 of his 7 seasons. He did win the ACC three years in a row (12-14). Only once did he win the conference when they played more than 2 top 25 conference opponents including the conference championship game. Hell, only three times have they played more than 2 top 25 conference opponents including the ACC championship game in his 7 years. What exactly is your case? If you bring up McElwain again, it will just be further proof you have none.
Keep cherry picking. You'll have enough to start a pie in a few hours at this rate. I've made my case. You have not. It is the HCs job to recruit and win. Jimbo has done both. You failing to see that is not my problem. The Mac comparison was you using one set of data that cpnpletely ignores every other metric to judge a HC.